rsalhus said:I never liked either one of them.
Isn't that what free will is all about. If you like it, use it; if you don't, don't.
rsalhus said:I never liked either one of them.
Tom said:I'm just curious Marc ... since FB is presumably for communicating with people, how does communication happen if their messages are blocked or ignored ???
Bob Buchanan said:It's not really a block of all communication, Tom, but rather just hiding their notes to the general Wall. I have several relatives and friends that write constant daily dribble (e.g., "sitting here trying to decide what to do today"), others that post the latest political talking points they hear on Fox or MSNBC, or some that love the dumb (to me) apps such as Farmville, and so forth. About once a week I temporarily UNhide them to see if I missed anything important. Communication still exists via mailbox, direct writes to profile walls, photo albums, and chat.
Tom said:Just curious Grant .... do you see Facebook as a place to advertise, or do you get any other real benefits from being there as a company?
Route 66 RV said:Tom,
Sorry for the delay - we have been swamped this past few weeks!
Facebook truly is a great place to spread the word on both your company's history, new products and services, new photos, etc. With so many people turning to social networking sites these days, it really reinforces the validity of your business, and your willingness to engage in your customers' needs. It would be a great avenue for this Forum, further reinforcing the benefits of this site.
From a digital marketing angle, it boost the validity of your business' site on Google ranks, as it links one of the most popular sites in the world to your company's website - a positive sign to Web Search Engines.
Best of all, you can really spread the word about yourself in "real time" at practically no cost, versus the other printed means we rely upon so much!
JimJohnson said:I think a better question would be, "Who isn't on Facebook these days?"
Ned said:The threat is much deeper than what the article goes into. Many people use the same login credentials for many or all of the web sites they access. So when one site is compromised, the hacker now has access to any site that requires your login. The solution, of course, is to use different passwords for every site that requires one. But how many people really do that? Raise your hands if you do, I won't have trouble counting