EPDM Coatings
rvupgradestore.com Composet Products Custom Yacht Interiors

Author Topic: why a V10  (Read 23612 times)

Uturnwilly

  • ---
  • Posts: 9
why a V10
« on: July 14, 2010, 04:00:37 PM »
Our Jayco 24ss C-class is built on the Ford E450 with the V10 Triton engine.

What is the advantage of the V10 6.8l over a V8 of comparble displacement? 

Just so I know. ;D

thanks
Bill
Snellville, Ga

AndyinLexington

  • ---
  • Posts: 574
Re: why a V10
« Reply #1 on: July 14, 2010, 04:21:11 PM »
I have had three of the V-10's - only one in a motorhome.  The other two were in a 15 pax van and a Ford Excursion.  I found it to be much smoother running, and nicer to drive because of that, than the comparable big block V-8's I've had.  FWIW, my V-10's were also much more trouble free, but that is likely related to the newer technology.  I've not had a "modern" big-block V-8, so nothing to compare it to there. 
Andy Holmes
2000 Holiday Rambler Admiral 34F
2005 Chev Malibu Toad
N1CPS
Lexington, Kentucky

scottydl

  • Admin assist
  • ---
  • *
  • Posts: 7881
  • Central IL
Re: why a V10
« Reply #2 on: July 14, 2010, 05:09:08 PM »
When the Ford 460 was no longer manufactured, Ford switched all their heavy duty chassis vehicles (motorhomes included) to the V10.  I'm assuming that nothing in their V8 arena has the HP/torque for sustained heavy usage over time.  Why they went to 10-cyl versus just keeping a big block 8-cyl, that I do not know.  :)

Wikipedia always has something to offer it seems: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V10_engine
Scott, wife, 3 boys... and the dog
- 2008 Forest River Wildwood 32BHDS
- 1995 Chevrolet Suburban C2500 tow vehicle
- 1994 Thor Residency motorhome... owned 2007-2012

Mexray

  • ---
  • Posts: 440
Re: why a V10
« Reply #3 on: July 14, 2010, 05:21:32 PM »
It's just plain cool to have the V-10 'bragging rights'.... ;D

Kind of like the Dodge Viper's V-10 screamin' engines - ,vroom, vroom...alas, Dodge quit building the Vipers this month!

I thinks it's the smoothness of the Ford V-10, that makes it such a 'hit' for the heavier vehicles - I believe they are a bit more economical, fuel wise, that would be a V-8 of similar specs...

As many an old hot rodder will tell you, "There's no substitute for cubic inches".... ::)

Ray
Ray & Pat near Lodi, CA...

camperkids1025

  • ---
  • Posts: 79
  • Bel Air, Maryland
Re: why a V10
« Reply #4 on: July 14, 2010, 05:27:29 PM »
When the 460CID was replaced with the V-10 it was mainly for the horse power output as well as the torque and the V-10 is a lighter weight engine.
Jim & Lois in Maryland
1999 37.5' Newmar Mountain Aire F-53 Chassis V-10 Ford
HWH Levelers / Bilsteins Shocks and Bilstein Steering Stablizer

scottydl

  • Admin assist
  • ---
  • *
  • Posts: 7881
  • Central IL
Re: why a V10
« Reply #5 on: July 14, 2010, 05:31:31 PM »
As many an old hot rodder will tell you, "There's no substitute for cubic inches".... ::)

If that's the case, then the older big block V8 wins... it is 460 cubic inches, vs. the newer V10's 415 or 450 cubic inches (I've found references to both sizes of V10).   There are more cylinders, but they're all smaller.  ;D
Scott, wife, 3 boys... and the dog
- 2008 Forest River Wildwood 32BHDS
- 1995 Chevrolet Suburban C2500 tow vehicle
- 1994 Thor Residency motorhome... owned 2007-2012

carson

  • ---
  • Posts: 4925
  • memories of yore
Re: why a V10
« Reply #6 on: July 14, 2010, 05:40:04 PM »
here is a little twist.... I guess we are talking torque..

   I see/hear Harley hogs going by at 40 mph and I can almost count the RPM's of the engine.....pop-pop-pop etc

   I think we should encourage Harley to build a V* for RV use. Same design, same sound  (valve timing)  and everyone would be happy. V4/V8/V10,V12(Jaguar etc) will be out the door.

  Now that would be status symbol.  ???   Made in America.

Sign me up. 


Carson FL


 
Carson, 
 West Central Florida
Ex RV'er. (1995 Winnebago Adventurer)
2007 Buick Rendezvous, SUV / CROSSOVER

...Logic works like a charm...

InPursuit

  • ---
  • Posts: 122
Re: why a V10
« Reply #7 on: July 14, 2010, 09:36:32 PM »
here is a little twist.... I guess we are talking torque..

   I think we should encourage Harley to build a V* for RV use. Same design, same sound  (valve timing)  and everyone would be happy. V4/V8/V10,V12(Jaguar etc) will be out the door.

I'd rather see Honda make the jump.

If you're talking torque their older V4 motors were tops!
The BOX STOCK early 80's Magna and Sabre 1100cc (65Cu in) were regularly dyno'ed at 108hp with over 90ft lb of torque...
and a red line of 11,000.  Now THAT is performance you can build on.

a 10 sec 1/4mi  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGfJ9IqXcoE
Bryan

2000 Georgie Boy Pursuit
Workhorse P32 chassis (It's a CH ch chevy...man!)
Now with new brakes, tires, improved suspension, remodeled bathroom, kitchen and over 9000 miles all since 3/10

Gary RV_Wizard

  • Forum Staff
  • ---
  • *
  • Posts: 62685
  • RVer Emeritus
Re: why a V10
« Reply #8 on: July 14, 2010, 10:02:28 PM »
Ford doesn't have a big block V8 anymore, so there isn't much to discuss. GM's 8.1L V8 gave about the same performance as the Ford V10 in a similar size motorhome, and their displacement was close to the same, so I guess the fair answer is that the V10 did not have any particular advantage.

As far as general theory goes, a V10 can rev higher for the same displacement because the pistons are smaller and lighter than a V8 of the same displacement.  Now one has to ask, why do you want to rev higher?  I'll leave that question as an exercise for the student...
Gary
--------------
Gary Brinck
Summers: Black Mountain, NC
Home: Ocala National Forest, FL

s2kskibum

  • ---
  • Posts: 220
Re: why a V10
« Reply #9 on: July 15, 2010, 09:04:36 AM »
here is a little twist.... I guess we are talking torque..

   I see/hear Harley hogs going by at 40 mph and I can almost count the RPM's of the engine.....pop-pop-pop etc

   I think we should encourage Harley to build a V* for RV use. Same design, same sound  (valve timing)  and everyone would be happy. V4/V8/V10,V12(Jaguar etc) will be out the door.Now that would be status symbol.  ???   Made in America. Sign me up.  Carson FL

I HATE LOUD BIKES! I know your comment was a bit tongue in cheek, but can you just imagine the reliability issues of Harley motorhomes...? I am a Chevy guy, but am very imprerssed with the 460 in my Bounder.
1994 Bounder 34J, Ford F53

2KViggen

  • ---
  • Posts: 324
Re: why a V10
« Reply #10 on: July 15, 2010, 09:25:17 AM »
For those of us who own a HD...... motorcycle that is .... can you imagine how much the HD powered RV would shake!!!!  It would be like driving down a cobblestone road in our present RV but we would be idling 

& yea, loud bikes of any make (OK, except Ducati) are definantly annoying

V8 vs V10 I drove 2 Fleetwood v10 RV's, a Terra & I can't remember the other model plus a WH V8 powered Bounder.  I really didn't pay any attention to how the RV accelerated (or I guess didn't accelerate) but I was looking at how the RV felt going down the road.  The WH felt a lot better & I am not sure if the actual chassis was different ot if the extra 3-7 feet of RV length made the Bounder feel better.

09 Buell 1125 cr

zukIzzy

  • ---
  • Posts: 430
Re: why a V10
« Reply #11 on: July 15, 2010, 09:52:46 AM »
The triton engine line is modular. With a slight modification at the plant the same assembly line makes the 4.6, 5.4  v8s and the 6.8 v10. (there is a v6 version too but I am not familiar with it) It was an ease of manufacture thing to stop producing the big block and just add 2 cyl to the 5.4 v8

wayne

DandS

  • Guest
Re: why a V10
« Reply #12 on: July 15, 2010, 10:34:35 AM »
What is the advantage of the V10 6.8l over a V8 of comparble displacement? 

Not sure there is one but they sure have a cool emblem !  8)

Utclmjmpr

  • ---
  • Posts: 3223
Re: why a V10
« Reply #13 on: July 15, 2010, 01:46:27 PM »
Carson, the Harley Davidson V twin does not get its distinctive cadence sound from the "valve timing",  its the odd number of degrees of the "V" design, not 45 degrees or 60 degrees.>>>Dan ( a dealer for 21 years)
38' American Tradition 38TT/330 turbo Cummins
Jeep liberty 4 down
72 VW Baja 4 down
Cedar City, Utah
USAF vet. 59-63
The difference between intelligence & stupidity is: intelligence has it's limits
      Albert Einstein.

zukIzzy

  • ---
  • Posts: 430
Re: why a V10
« Reply #14 on: July 15, 2010, 02:01:50 PM »
Carson, the Harley Davidson V twin does not get its distinctive cadence sound from the "valve timing",  its the odd number of degrees of the "V" design, not 45 degrees or 60 degrees.>>>Dan ( a dealer for 21 years)

You are right but they are 45* v twins. more comon is the 90* and 60* v motors.

FYI you can make a Corvair motor sound just like a harley by muffling 4 cylinders and running straight pipes out of 2 that are 45* apart ;)

KlipschHead281

  • Guest
Re: why a V10
« Reply #15 on: July 15, 2010, 02:05:20 PM »
Ford doesn't have a big block V8 anymore, so there isn't much to discuss. GM's 8.1L V8 gave about the same performance as the Ford V10 in a similar size motorhome, and their displacement was close to the same, so I guess the fair answer is that the V10 did not have any particular advantage.

As far as general theory goes, a V10 can rev higher for the same displacement because the pistons are smaller and lighter than a V8 of the same displacement.  Now one has to ask, why do you want to rev higher?  I'll leave that question as an exercise for the student...

Well, in this case, the Ford V10 has a rev limit in a stock configuration of 5250rpms, not exactly a high revolution monster. But it is s a good durable engine and mine pulls 36ft of MH just fine.

KlipschHead281

  • Guest
Re: why a V10
« Reply #16 on: July 15, 2010, 02:06:53 PM »
The triton engine line is modular. With a slight modification at the plant the same assembly line makes the 4.6, 5.4  v8s and the 6.8 v10. (there is a v6 version too but I am not familiar with it) It was an ease of manufacture thing to stop producing the big block and just add 2 cyl to the 5.4 v8

wayne

Exactly.  8)

Gordon Groff

  • ---
  • Posts: 471
Re: why a V10
« Reply #17 on: July 15, 2010, 02:34:23 PM »
I had a Ford 460 in a '95 32' class C that was terrific.  A couple years later (97?), I drove basically the same coach in a V10 and was underwhelmed.  I was surprised in how much of a step down it was in torque.  I have a 2010 V10 in my 34' class A now and it's terrific.  Stronger than the old 460 FI.  Pulls great, can't hardly tell when my toad is back there.  It does roar like a banshee if I wind it up to 5000 rpm.  I always turn to my wife and say "I am Tiffin, hear me roar!"  Otherwise, it's quiet and well-behaved.

I think the first couple years of V10's were not as refined or as torquey as the current ones.  I don't think there's any intrinsic advantage to the # of cylinders.   Like as has been said, it was to streamline (cheapen) manufacturing for Ford.  I'm very happy to hear all the good reports of durability for this engine.  I was leery of it going in, based on my experience a decade ago.

Gordon
Gordon and Sweet Nancy
2010 Tiffin Allegro 35 QBA
2010 Honda CRV Toad
8Lb. Papillon

Joezeppy

  • ---
  • Posts: 1771
Re: why a V10
« Reply #18 on: July 15, 2010, 02:55:05 PM »
I believe that for 2011 the Ford V10 is gone and is being replaced by a new 6.2L V8 - for the F250/350, at least. The 6.2 will even be available in certain versions of the F150 such as the "Raptor" - a specialty off-road pickup.
Joe & Kim
Upstate NY - Kuyahoora Valley
2010 GMC Sierra 2500HD - 6.0L
2017 Keystone Hideout 295BHS
Andersen Ultimate Aluminum 5th wheel hitch

carson

  • ---
  • Posts: 4925
  • memories of yore
Re: why a V10
« Reply #19 on: July 15, 2010, 03:30:15 PM »
Quote
carson, the Harley Davidson V twin does not get its distinctive cadence   sound from the "valve timing",  its the odd number of degrees of the "V"   design, not 45 degrees or 60 degrees.>>>Dan ( a dealer for 21   years)

Thanks guys, I knew my timing suggestion was a bit suspicious. I remember now having read about the real cadence origin.

Carson FL

« Last Edit: July 15, 2010, 03:31:57 PM by carson »
Carson, 
 West Central Florida
Ex RV'er. (1995 Winnebago Adventurer)
2007 Buick Rendezvous, SUV / CROSSOVER

...Logic works like a charm...

700renegade

  • ---
  • Posts: 36
Re: why a V10
« Reply #20 on: July 17, 2010, 02:15:07 PM »
Carson, the Harley Davidson V twin does not get its distinctive cadence sound from the "valve timing",  its the odd number of degrees of the "V" design, not 45 degrees or 60 degrees.>>>Dan ( a dealer for 21 years)

Wait a minute....  I thought the Harley sound is from the fact they use a common crank journal for both cylinders.  Valve timing and angle of the cylinder separation aren't the reason are they?

Sorry to keep dragging this off subject.
'94 Newmar Kountry Star
38' Ford chassis w/ Granning air tag
single 12' slide

carson

  • ---
  • Posts: 4925
  • memories of yore
Re: why a V10
« Reply #21 on: July 17, 2010, 02:53:43 PM »
There must be an interest about the Harley cadence.

   I have never owned a Harley so I don't know what I am talking about.   ;D

Best think I can do is offer this link:  http://auto.howstuffworks.com/harley3.htm

I'll keep reading the posts.

Carson FL

Carson, 
 West Central Florida
Ex RV'er. (1995 Winnebago Adventurer)
2007 Buick Rendezvous, SUV / CROSSOVER

...Logic works like a charm...

Utclmjmpr

  • ---
  • Posts: 3223
Re: why a V10
« Reply #22 on: July 17, 2010, 03:41:42 PM »
Also both cylinders fire at the same time,,, one on the power (compression) stroke and one on the exhaust stroke, it uses a "timer" not a distributor and only one coil.>>>Dan
38' American Tradition 38TT/330 turbo Cummins
Jeep liberty 4 down
72 VW Baja 4 down
Cedar City, Utah
USAF vet. 59-63
The difference between intelligence & stupidity is: intelligence has it's limits
      Albert Einstein.

Geoff_T

  • ---
  • Posts: 117
    • My "day" Job !!!
Re: why a V10
« Reply #23 on: July 18, 2010, 02:20:04 PM »
Hi

While no expert on the Ford V10 I have been reading bad things about them on Ford related web sites. Apparently there are lots of problems with the cylinder head spark plug locations....

http://www.twoguysgarage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=7423

The plug held in the aluminium head by only 4 threads especially drew my attention.

I am really happy with the 7.5 litre Ford V8 that hauls our 350 based Fleetwood Jamboree Searcher  ;)

As for Harleys... I'm English, the land that produced the Vincent Black Shadow if you want a well designed V twin.
I prefer the thud of that beast to the stacato racket of the open pipe Harleys that hang around here!

Geoff

Utclmjmpr

  • ---
  • Posts: 3223
Re: why a V10
« Reply #24 on: July 18, 2010, 03:59:05 PM »
Geof,, Altho I also like the Vincents, I particularly like the two Ariel squares I own, nothing sounds like a Mk. 2  on a hard pull.>>>Dan
38' American Tradition 38TT/330 turbo Cummins
Jeep liberty 4 down
72 VW Baja 4 down
Cedar City, Utah
USAF vet. 59-63
The difference between intelligence & stupidity is: intelligence has it's limits
      Albert Einstein.

KlipschHead281

  • Guest
Re: why a V10
« Reply #25 on: July 18, 2010, 07:02:24 PM »
Hi

While no expert on the Ford V10 I have been reading bad things about them on Ford related web sites. Apparently there are lots of problems with the cylinder head spark plug locations....

http://www.twoguysgarage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=7423

The plug held in the aluminium head by only 4 threads especially drew my attention.

I am really happy with the 7.5 litre Ford V8 that hauls our 350 based Fleetwood Jamboree Searcher  ;)

As for Harleys... I'm English, the land that produced the Vincent Black Shadow if you want a well designed V twin.
I prefer the thud of that beast to the stacato racket of the open pipe Harleys that hang around here!

Geoff

The sparkplug issue was with V10's produced over a decade ago and the numbers were small, it's unfortunate that QC didn't catch the batch that made it into vehicles but again, the numbers were small.

RoyM

  • ---
  • Posts: 1976
Re: why a V10
« Reply #26 on: July 18, 2010, 07:27:58 PM »
The move from the torquey 460 V-8 to the higher revving V-10 likely had a lot to do with emissions. They didn't just tack 2 more cylinders on an existing design.
Ram 2500 diesel
Prowler fifth wheel
Urge to travel

Geoff_T

  • ---
  • Posts: 117
    • My "day" Job !!!
Re: why a V10
« Reply #27 on: July 18, 2010, 07:42:17 PM »
Hi

My post was rather tongue in cheek because I couldn't see the point in making the V10... more reciprocating parts, and who needs high revs in an RV? As they are going back to a V8, presumably with good emissions as well, perhaps Ford see the error of their ways...  ;)

Yes, the Arial Square Four was a great bike, as were all the Vincents, albeit years ahead of their time. Then came the Japanese invasion that I watched, first hand, in the 1960's.

Harleys, to an English eye, are antiquated dinosaurs with tooth shaking vibration. An acquaintance had one and found it unwilling to go around corners... he sold it and bought a Ducati and his ride was transformed.

 :)


Geoff
« Last Edit: July 18, 2010, 07:51:02 PM by Geoff_T »

shawnc

  • ---
  • Posts: 69
Re: why a V10
« Reply #28 on: July 18, 2010, 10:22:37 PM »
It's all about saving money on the assembly line.  It's part of Ford's modular engine line (4.6, 5.4 and 6.8 all have the same bore diameter).  The V-10 has the same bore and stroke as the 5.4.  That means they only need one size piston and can either change the connecting rod length or crank shaft to adjust the displacement and can use the same size pistons and connecting rods in the 5.4 and 6.8.  The angle of the bore banks may be varied though to fine tune for vibrations.

Other manufactures do it.  AMC did similar thing with the 2.5 and 4.0.  THe 2.5 was just a 4.0 with 2 cylinders lopped off and GM did it with the 4.2 I6, 3.5 I5 and 2.8 I4.
« Last Edit: July 18, 2010, 10:24:52 PM by shawnc »

Geoff_T

  • ---
  • Posts: 117
    • My "day" Job !!!
Re: why a V10
« Reply #29 on: July 19, 2010, 04:20:13 PM »
Hi

It's still a bunch more moving parts though... a V12 would be smoother but even more parts.

The Vincent 1000cc V twins came about because Phil Irving (if I recall correctly) had two blueprints of the 500cc single on top of each other and realised, by rotating them 90 degrees, he could fit a twin in the same frame. I think the Jaguar V12's were two straight six heads on a new block.

 :)

Geoff

Kim58

  • ---
  • Posts: 36
Re: why a V10
« Reply #30 on: July 24, 2010, 09:22:49 PM »
Hi

While no expert on the Ford V10 I have been reading bad things about them on Ford related web sites. Apparently there are lots of problems with the cylinder head spark plug locations....

http://www.twoguysgarage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=7423

The plug held in the aluminium head by only 4 threads especially drew my attention.

I am really happy with the 7.5 litre Ford V8 that hauls our 350 based Fleetwood Jamboree Searcher  ;)

As for Harleys... I'm English, the land that produced the Vincent Black Shadow if you want a well designed V twin.
I prefer the thud of that beast to the stacato racket of the open pipe Harleys that hang around here!

Geoff
this thread caught my eye, because when I talked to my mechanic about engine choices for my future RV, he Does not like the V10's at all.
  Hmm

Gary RV_Wizard

  • Forum Staff
  • ---
  • *
  • Posts: 62685
  • RVer Emeritus
Re: why a V10
« Reply #31 on: July 25, 2010, 07:38:18 AM »
Mechanics are like everybody else - they have opinions that are not always based on facts. Sometimes it is just an aversion to something different. A lot of mechanics disliked the electronic control engines too - it made many of their skills obsolete and they did not like dealing with them.  Overall, the Ford V10 has been remarkably trouble free engine. Not 100%, of course, but none of them are.

The GM 8.1L V8 is a really excellent engine too. Probably more reliable than even the V10. And nearly all mechanics love a traditional big block V8!
Gary
--------------
Gary Brinck
Summers: Black Mountain, NC
Home: Ocala National Forest, FL

Kim58

  • ---
  • Posts: 36
Re: why a V10
« Reply #32 on: July 29, 2010, 05:34:02 AM »
Mechanics are like everybody else - they have opinions that are not always based on facts. Sometimes it is just an aversion to something different. A lot of mechanics disliked the electronic control engines too - it made many of their skills obsolete and they did not like dealing with them.  Overall, the Ford V10 has been remarkably trouble free engine. Not 100%, of course, but none of them are.

The GM 8.1L V8 is a really excellent engine too. Probably more reliable than even the V10. And nearly all mechanics love a traditional big block V8!
Thanks for that Gary, I was just trying to convince my soon to be Ex of that fact.  While I adore my mechanic and he is very experienced, I knew he had certain likes and dislikes.  Funny when I had my Dodge Ram I seem to remember his raving about the Triton engines!  LOL
  I have found something that interests me with a V10 and it only has 14000 miles on it.
 

hoddinron

  • ---
  • Posts: 362
    • My blog
Re: why a V10
« Reply #33 on: July 29, 2010, 01:56:48 PM »
Isn't it funny how we hear one or two "good" or "bad" things about an engine (or whatever) and we store that in our brains, and it influences our purchasing for years.

I met a van driver who had a V-10 Ford who had experienced two spark plug blowouts in his V-10 Ford engine in one year.  I knew after hearing that I'd never want one!  But maybe it was just a few engines during a year's worth of manufacturing??

Coming home from a 10,000 mile trip, I chatted with a Ford V10 PU owner pulling a large box trailer.  He complained that he was only getting 5 MPG!  I was towing my 20 foot TT with my Dodge Hemi 5.7, and was getting 12 - 13 MPG.  That also turned me off on Ford V-10s.   But maybe he like to drive 75 MPH into a 20 MPH headwind!  Who knows?? 

That's why Forums like this are so Valuable!!  ;D ;D

Thanks for sharing!

Ron
Ron & Joyce - Retired
2012 Ram 2500 Cummins Diesel 2.73 axle
2016 Sabre 25 RL 5th Wheel

Johncmr

  • ---
  • Posts: 202
Re: why a V10
« Reply #34 on: August 04, 2010, 12:11:18 PM »
I've had 2  V-10 trucks, and liked them both.  This last one has the 3 valve system (2005 F-250 SD 4x4) and pulls very well.  As mentioned in another thread, I put a K&N air system, Gibson Exhaust and Banks power chip.  I can pull my 25ft Titanium 5er on most roads with the cruise control engaged, and only use the "tow mode" in hilly areas.

Several things add to the V-10's desirability, they are overhead cam engines, so they can safely rev higher than push-rod engines, they have aluminum heads, so the engine total weight is lower (about 890 pounds lighter than Ford's big diesel), and they do not need tubro-charging and associated inter-cooling to get the torque numbers up.  So far gasoline is cheaper than diesel, but that can change.  There is a heck of a lot more room under the hood of my truck than my friend's with the diesel.  Heaven help him if he has to change an alternator.  I just wish the transmission was as beefy as the engine. 

Oh, I do miss the V-8 sound, even with the Gibson exhaust this thing sounds like a pregnant bumble bee stuck to a rock singers microphone.

Finally, anyone else find back-up info for Ford cutting the V-10 out for 2011?

johncmr

KlipschHead281

  • Guest
Re: why a V10
« Reply #35 on: August 04, 2010, 01:49:01 PM »
I've had 2  V-10 trucks, and liked them both.  This last one has the 3 valve system (2005 F-250 SD 4x4) and pulls very well.  As mentioned in another thread, I put a K&N air system, Gibson Exhaust and Banks power chip.  I can pull my 25ft Titanium 5er on most roads with the cruise control engaged, and only use the "tow mode" in hilly areas.

Several things add to the V-10's desirability, they are overhead cam engines, so they can safely rev higher than push-rod engines, they have aluminum heads, so the engine total weight is lower (about 890 pounds lighter than Ford's big diesel), and they do not need tubro-charging and associated inter-cooling to get the torque numbers up.  So far gasoline is cheaper than diesel, but that can change.  There is a heck of a lot more room under the hood of my truck than my friend's with the diesel.  Heaven help him if he has to change an alternator.  I just wish the transmission was as beefy as the engine. 

Oh, I do miss the V-8 sound, even with the Gibson exhaust this thing sounds like a pregnant bumble bee stuck to a rock singers microphone.

Finally, anyone else find back-up info for Ford cutting the V-10 out for 2011?

johncmr
 

The 3 Valve may rev higher than push rod motors but the previous ones (I don't know what the 3valve rev limit is) had a rev limit of 5250 or there a bouts and that is a very low limit. Adding headers and a chip may improve that number a tad but most push rod motors can rev higher. Now my 3 vlalve 4.6 with new air box and tuning went from a 6250 rev limit to 6750 which is incredible. The new 5.0 4v motor handles 7,000 all day. So I like the V10, but as a rev machine it just isn't one. My old 5.0 push rod could spin to 6k easily, 350 small blocks bone stock even in the '80's could rev higher than the V10. :)


Johncmr

  • ---
  • Posts: 202
Re: why a V10
« Reply #36 on: August 04, 2010, 06:01:49 PM »
You're correct.  I was thinking more of the big block engines like the 460, which stock were pretty well tuned for torque. 
I know in the motorcycle engines the racing ones run 10 -12K rpm, but their reciprocating weight is WAY lower than car engines 5.0 or so displacement, and a few pounds below truck engines like 6.0L diesels and the 6.8L V-10.
I suppose I can run the truck @ 5K on a hill or something, but the friggin noise is incredible, so I wimp out and keep it no higher than 4 - 4.2K.
I never looked up the rev limit, but I'm sure MY rev tolerance is below what the computer's is!  Humm-I don't think I'd want to rev a stock big diameter torque converter too high either.

johncmr

DonTom

  • ---
  • Posts: 2199
Re: why a V10
« Reply #37 on: August 04, 2010, 08:04:02 PM »
this thread caught my eye, because when I talked to my mechanic about engine choices for my future RV, he Does not like the V10's at all.
  Hmm
Neither do I. It's a rather small (not much larger than 400 CID) high revving engine that gets lousy MPG and has had its share of problems. When I was looking for a used RV, I would not look at any Ford V-10's, but the older 460 I would consider. Unfortunately, most smaller class C RV's these days are V-10's.

But I realize there are many people who like the V-10's. I just don't understand why. I know of no advantage of the V-10 compared to other engines, but there does seem to be some disadvantages.

Now, I  expect to be bombarded with messages  from the many happy V-10 owners.;D

-Don- SSF, CA
-Don-   AA6GA

2000 Fleetwood Tioga 24D, 7.4L

Nine  motorcycles:
1971 BMW R75/5
1984 Yamaha Venture
2002 Suzuki DR200SE
2013 Triumph Trophy SE
2016 Versys 650 LT
2016 Moto Guzzi Stelvio
2017 Zero DS ZF6.5
2017 Zero SR 13 w/pwr tank
2017 H-D RoadGlide Ultra FLTRU

DonTom

  • ---
  • Posts: 2199
Re: why a V10
« Reply #38 on: August 04, 2010, 08:17:09 PM »
The GM 8.1L V8 is a really excellent engine too. Probably more reliable than even the V10.
I wouldn't say "probably". I would say there's no doubt. That's the engine I wish I had in my small Class C. But I am very happy with my 7.4L and gets 9.5 MPG freeway average, which is a lot better than I thought was possible. And it has plenty of power on the hills. But for a RV, I want the largest and most reliable gasoline engine possible, which I believe is that 8.1L. But they don't seem to put that in my size Class C RV's (26 feet or less).

-Don- SSF, CA
-Don-   AA6GA

2000 Fleetwood Tioga 24D, 7.4L

Nine  motorcycles:
1971 BMW R75/5
1984 Yamaha Venture
2002 Suzuki DR200SE
2013 Triumph Trophy SE
2016 Versys 650 LT
2016 Moto Guzzi Stelvio
2017 Zero DS ZF6.5
2017 Zero SR 13 w/pwr tank
2017 H-D RoadGlide Ultra FLTRU

KlipschHead281

  • Guest
Re: why a V10
« Reply #39 on: August 05, 2010, 11:11:39 AM »
Neither do I. It's a rather small (not much larger than 400 CID) high revving engine that gets lousy MPG and has had its share of problems. When I was looking for a used RV, I would not look at any Ford V-10's, but the older 460 I would consider. Unfortunately, most smaller class C RV's these days are V-10's.

But I realize there are many people who like the V-10's. I just don't understand why. I know of no advantage of the V-10 compared to other engines, but there does seem to be some disadvantages.

Now, I  expect to be bombarded with messages  from the many happy V-10 owners.;D

-Don- SSF, CA
 
When you have a preconceived opinion about something you will defend it, wrong or right. The Ford V10 as it is now is a terrific engine that gets excellent power for a gasser, decent mpg, certainly no worse than any of the competition. The 460 was a good engine, fantastic even but emissions and too many engines not making the upcoming emissions standards in the mid 90ís forced Ford to build more emission friendly tighter tolerance engines using a modular design, smart thinking in my humble view and it works like a charm. Consider the new 5.0, GM needs cubic inches to attain big numbers, 412hp from such a small engine is phenomenal.

What share of issues, the big one was spark plug blow out and this number was a small one, other than that the history of the V10 is excellent. We could argue better than the 454 and more powerful as well in later configurations.

The 460 in its best (last) configuration put out 245hp and 395lb-ft and the V10 in itís original config (like in my 1999) put out 275hp and 415lb-ft (305hp and 425lb-ft in truck installs) so not sure why you would like the larger 460 more when it in fact is the weaker of the two and gets worse mpg? The current model puts out 362hp and 457lb-ft and if you consider that weak then no gas engine will suit you.

Add the full bolt on Banks power pack and the numbers for the V10 jump significantly. Will it ever equal a good DP, no way but for a gasser you canít do any better.
« Last Edit: August 05, 2010, 11:37:23 AM by KlipschHead281 »

Gordon Groff

  • ---
  • Posts: 471
Re: why a V10
« Reply #40 on: August 05, 2010, 02:24:29 PM »
Ineresting post KlipschHead! (do you know Horn Ed?)
When I drove the earliest V10 on a similar C to mine with a 460, it seemed lacking.  That musta been my imagination based on the numbers you give.  I am extremely impressed by the V10 in my 44,000lb. Tiffin.  That was a concern, but I can say that it has plenty of what it takes to move her down the highway.   Have to check the camera to see if our toad is there. :)

Gordon
Gordon and Sweet Nancy
2010 Tiffin Allegro 35 QBA
2010 Honda CRV Toad
8Lb. Papillon

KlipschHead281

  • Guest
Re: why a V10
« Reply #41 on: August 05, 2010, 02:52:54 PM »
Gordon,

I have seen a lot of posts by people who don't own the V10 and a lot of them call it too weak or the 8.1 is far better and the last versions of the 8.1 were indeed great engines but were they better, I don't think so. If you got an early one it made only 225hp (can't find torque for the first year), 50hp less than the Triton V10 while the newest version in RV application made 340hp and 455lb-ft, hardly stronger than the Triton V10.  Both the V10 and 8.1 GM engines produced very healthy torque for gas engines and will work just fine in up to 37ft MH's in my view.

People can argue which one is really better till the cows come home but would either be right? Of course! Ford = First On Race Day!  ;D

DandS

  • Guest
Re: why a V10
« Reply #42 on: August 05, 2010, 02:57:20 PM »
It's a rather small (not much larger than 400 CID) high revving engine that gets lousy MPG and has had its share of problems.

I guess 362HP is a small engine to some and 7-7.5 mpg on a 38' coach pulling a toad may seem like lousy mileage, but not sure about all the problems?? I've had two V-10's the last six years (05' version and 08' version) and haven't had problem one. IMO, it's a winner! :)

KlipschHead281

  • Guest
Re: why a V10
« Reply #43 on: August 05, 2010, 06:36:45 PM »
I guess 362HP is a small engine to some and 7-7.5 mpg on a 38' coach pulling a toad may seem like lousy mileage, but not sure about all the problems?? I've had two V-10's the last six years (05' version and 08' version) and haven't had problem one. IMO, it's a winner! :)

Mine is 11 years old and pulls the 36ft Endeavor with no problem what so ever. I would LOVE to get a new 3V V10 in there. :)
There is a thread devoted to the 8.1 and possible issues, should we say people shouldn't buy an RV with one?  :o 
http://www.rvforum.net/SMF_forum/index.php?topic=24251.0
« Last Edit: August 05, 2010, 06:39:11 PM by KlipschHead281 »

DaBeav

  • Posts: 2
Re: why a V10
« Reply #44 on: January 31, 2018, 04:11:51 PM »
Torque is the answer you seek. While the output for 460 engines built before 1972 is a whopping 365 horsepower at 4,600 rpm and 485 pound-feet of torque at 2,800 rpm, the output for the 460 starting in 1972 is only 212 horsepower at 4,400 rpm and 342 pound-feet of torque at 2,600 rpm. Thanks to emission controls that's quite a drop in power not to mention torque. However after the mid-1980s, carburetors were replaced with electronic fuel injection boosting the 460's output back up a bit to 245 horsepower and 400 pound-feet of torque. On the other hand Ford's 6.8-liter V10 engine is rated at 288 horsepower, along with 424 lb.-ft. of torque. More ponies with 24 foot lbs of additional usable torque is nothing to sneeze at, especially when you're pulling so much weight. In addition to this the V10 runs noticeably smoother.
« Last Edit: January 31, 2018, 04:13:25 PM by DaBeav »

Memtb

  • ---
  • Posts: 342
Re: why a V10
« Reply #45 on: January 31, 2018, 08:25:54 PM »
this thread caught my eye, because when I talked to my mechanic about engine choices for my future RV, he Does not like the V10's at all.
  Hmm

    Kim58, The early V-10’s, did indeed have a problem...more like only about 3 full threads holding the spark plug. My younger brother had a spark plug blow out twice (two different plugs) in his Motorhome.
    If anyone has this issue “do not” use a typical “heli-coil” repair. It will likely fail! Ford designed a specific repair for that issue.
     Ford addressed the issue, changing head design, to give more threads for the plug. This was done about mid-year 2004. As most rv’s have the previous years chassis, I personally would not buy anything older than an ‘06. There is a way to verify the production date on the engine... but it’s kind of a pain in the behind. Safer to buy ‘06 or newer. That was our choice.

  Other than the early head design issues....they are a “rock solid” engine!
Todd and Marianne
Home Base: Winchester, Wy.
Miniature Schnauzers - Sundai, Nellie and Maggie Mae
2007 Dodge Ram 3500,  6.7 Ram 6 speed manual, 4x4
2004 Teton Grand Freedom
2007 Bigfoot Class C

Professor54313

  • ---
  • Posts: 14
Re: why a V10
« Reply #46 on: February 09, 2018, 04:44:43 PM »
The date of the revision was December 1999 . I know because my 2000 Coachman  had a December 1999  engine which was the last of the 3 thread spark plugs. So I missed the revision by a month . You want engines made after jan 2000.
You can tell if you have those heads by removing the doghouse ( on Class C) and looking at the rear of the heads. They wrote the date of engine manufacturing on the rear surface . Mine was a yellow marker.

Willandgiselarv

  • ---
  • Posts: 119
Re: why a V10
« Reply #47 on: February 09, 2018, 07:50:07 PM »
Hi

It's still a bunch more moving parts though... a V12 would be smoother but even more parts.

The Vincent 1000cc V twins came about because Phil Irving (if I recall correctly) had two blueprints of the 500cc single on top of each other and realised, by rotating them 90 degrees, he could fit a twin in the same frame. I think the Jaguar V12's were two straight six heads on a new block.

 :)

Geoff

Yes we had the v12 jaguar and it would actually run off 1 bank, and pretty smoothly.
Never had a Ford V10 but when it first came out I was impressed by Ford
2004 GB. Bellagio 38ft  3126E Allison 3060
2015 Jeep Cherokee Trailhawk

billwild

  • ---
  • Posts: 712
Re: why a V10
« Reply #48 on: February 10, 2018, 05:03:53 PM »
I still remember replacing the spark plugs on an old 1987 class C with the 460. Changed out 7 plugs in short order then for the life of me I could not change out the last one. Gave up after hours. Later I heard they actually jack up one side of the engine in the shops  to get at that one plug. I can only imagine the work it would take to change out all 10 in the Ford V10.

Bill

Charlie 5320

  • ---
  • Posts: 2071
Re: why a V10
« Reply #49 on: February 12, 2018, 12:16:30 PM »
Ford doesn't have a big block V8 anymore, so there isn't much to discuss. GM's 8.1L V8 gave about the same performance as the Ford V10 in a similar size motorhome, and their displacement was close to the same, so I guess the fair answer is that the V10 did not have any particular advantage.

As far as general theory goes, a V10 can rev higher for the same displacement because the pistons are smaller and lighter than a V8 of the same displacement.  Now one has to ask, why do you want to rev higher?  I'll leave that question as an exercise for the student...
The ford V10 don't even compare in size to the 8.1. The 8.1 is 496 CI with much more torque. No comparison when moving a heavy vehicle. The V10 reaches it's HP level at a much higher RPM than the 8.1. Both Ford and GM abandoned the big block V8 to go to modular engines. The 6.0 GM truck engine is no more fuel efficient than the old 7.4 or the 8.1, and a LOT less torque. Yea they got the HP just like Ford but they really have to crank the engine up to get it. So they just increased speeds in the trans to compensate for LACK of torque, and crank the engines up.     
« Last Edit: February 12, 2018, 04:25:15 PM by Charlie 5320 »
2003 National Dolphin 5320
496  8.1  Workhorse

98 Damon Daybreak 3130
GM Vortech 454  4L80E
SOLD

oldryder

  • ---
  • Posts: 39
Re: why a V10
« Reply #50 on: February 12, 2018, 01:17:52 PM »
I was told Ford made the V10 because it's just a 5 liter V8 with two more cylinders.  That means many ignition, valve train, and fuel system parts will be the same for the V8 and V10 and yields considerable cost savings for the manufacturer.  I'd be interested to know if this is true.

Lou Schneider

  • Forum Staff
  • ---
  • *
  • Posts: 8000
Re: why a V10
« Reply #51 on: February 12, 2018, 08:44:38 PM »
I can't find a current reference for this, but I remember reading Ford killed the 460 V-8 because of emission problems.   They found a bore over a certain diameter left a pool of unburned fuel in the center of the cylinder that was ejected out the exhaust, increasing the hydrocarbon count to unacceptable levels. 

This not only made the engine unable to meet tighter emission standards but not burning all of the fuel in the cylinder also gave the large bore V-8 it's reputation of being able to pass anything but a gas station.

Going to more cylinders let them continue to have a high displacement engine without having to increase the bore beyond the critical size.
« Last Edit: February 12, 2018, 08:50:28 PM by Lou Schneider »

TonyDtorch

  • Guest
Re: why a V10
« Reply #52 on: February 12, 2018, 09:29:35 PM »
Changing plugs is actually very easy on the V10.   They are right on the top of the engine.

 You do need a special 12" inch long sparkplug socket, and make sure to use anti-seize on the plugs.....  but the good news is...they are not supposed to need replacing for 100k miles.

IMO...the 3 valve V10 is a wonderful engine.
« Last Edit: February 12, 2018, 09:35:36 PM by TonyDtorch »

 

Hosted by Over The Network