Hi, I'm Holly, I'm new here.
I'm unemployed and contemplating retirement. The problem is that long term I can't afford my mortgage where I presently live (near San Francisco) and can't afford to sell in this terrible market. So get a job (looking less and less likely at 62) or renting out my home and shipping out are really my options.
There is nothing to keep me in California, I won't miss it. I have thought in terms of renting, buying the cheapest shack where the climate is tolerable (is the climate actually tolerable anywhere that doesn't cost a fortune!!??).
So someone suggested considering full-timing.
But then there is my lifetime of collected stuff. I am resigned to only being able to keep 3500lbs or so but that's still quite a lot.
so if I went full-time my stuff would have to go into storage perhaps.
Then again the cheapest lot with a manufactured home on it (and no deed restrictions - that is the big issue) doesn't seem
to cost a lot more on a mortgage than paying for storage. Doesn't having a permanent home have advantages even if
you hardly ever use it (like an annual visit for a couple of weeks perhaps).
Has anyone else done this equation? What do you think?
Here is an example of what I have in mind as an alternative to paying for storage (I do realize it
might be necessary to find a house-sitter, but that can't be impossible).
http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/8085-Heck-Dr-North-Fort-Myers-FL-33917/45491637_zpid/
It's just an example to give you an idea of the kind of money I have in mind.
I would love to hear your opinions on being 97% of fulltime.
I'm unemployed and contemplating retirement. The problem is that long term I can't afford my mortgage where I presently live (near San Francisco) and can't afford to sell in this terrible market. So get a job (looking less and less likely at 62) or renting out my home and shipping out are really my options.
There is nothing to keep me in California, I won't miss it. I have thought in terms of renting, buying the cheapest shack where the climate is tolerable (is the climate actually tolerable anywhere that doesn't cost a fortune!!??).
So someone suggested considering full-timing.
But then there is my lifetime of collected stuff. I am resigned to only being able to keep 3500lbs or so but that's still quite a lot.
so if I went full-time my stuff would have to go into storage perhaps.
Then again the cheapest lot with a manufactured home on it (and no deed restrictions - that is the big issue) doesn't seem
to cost a lot more on a mortgage than paying for storage. Doesn't having a permanent home have advantages even if
you hardly ever use it (like an annual visit for a couple of weeks perhaps).
Has anyone else done this equation? What do you think?
Here is an example of what I have in mind as an alternative to paying for storage (I do realize it
might be necessary to find a house-sitter, but that can't be impossible).
http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/8085-Heck-Dr-North-Fort-Myers-FL-33917/45491637_zpid/
It's just an example to give you an idea of the kind of money I have in mind.
I would love to hear your opinions on being 97% of fulltime.