Mr E was convinced we needed two, but I do not think we do and I think he is coming around.
I am getting a better understanding of this, just have to think on it some. Ok, I found what the module is that the converter/charger attaches to. It is the battery isolation module, it has a wire to the chassis batteries and one to the coach batteries, one is identified as main and the other auxillary. Then in the middle is the alternator wire.
He was thinking that the smart module would not be able to bridge all this and monitor all the batteries, but from what I've read it can.
It sounds as though it does a quick fast charge and then maintains. I do see what he is saying as its maintaining about 12.72 and he had checked when it was hooked up to the coach ones and was 13 something but I think that was doing the fast charge up, they were down to practically nothing. He thinks they are not maintaining at a high enough level, and I think they are though its probably about 90%, but I've read that that reading is considered a full charge. I had him go ahead and hook up both sets and now both sets are reading the same amount or for example 12.72 to 12.74, very little variation between the sets.
Today I took the coach for about a 12 mile drive, the alternator was showing about 13.5 when driving, as a reading so its charging. When I got home I measured the batteries again and I had 12.99 and 12.89 so they charged on that short drive. I was also down to 1/8 tank of diesel so put in $100 worth, that's a laugh at $3.89 a gallon, from what I'm reading though that's a decent price. It's not quite half a tank but ok.
Here is what we consider an issue, but perhaps its a none issue. I think I have finally figured out what was done by a previous owner or owners, not sure why but might have been expense or just aggravation from run down batteries.
I think the inverter and the converter/charger quit working or perhaps the inverter kept pulling to much juice and ran the batteries down. So they disconnected the inverter all through the system. I will check tomorrow but I beleive the inverter line out of the main box has even been disconnected and that's why we had a couple of loose wires out there.We kept seeing loose wires and wondering why. So instead of replacing the inverter, they bought an ATS #2 or we call it baby ATS and put that module under the bed. Then they bought a new converter/charger and wired it into the ATS #2 under the bed. This was then wired into panel number 1 under the bed. Also they wired one of the AC units into this unit so we have 1 unit on panel 1 and 1 unit on panel 2. From what I've read in my manual the old inverter seemed to have a built in ATS but a stand alone converter/charger. It also told which items it would run. The inverter had a nice panel inside said when it was on, said when the batteries were low or if it was to hot or if the batteries were to hot and it would shut down. That was pretty much it. And since it was an integral part then if demand was read and nothing else was available on it went. I can see if something went awry you could easily have dead batteries, especially if the charger quit working so it looked like they bypassed all this.Oh and we determined the leftover positive battery cable goes to the inverter, so that mystery solved.
Then also I think part of this was done so when you plugged the 50 amp into a 30 amp you would have one air conditioner running off the one 110 panel number 1 and have all the items hooked into it useable and they limited it that way. But when doing this you can see wires were added to the panel and some disabled in the ATS 2, so it kept getting more interesting. When we put the converter charger back in the bay and removed the original, we also removed the added wires for it from under the bed. It's all working fine out there. It's up on a shelf so dry and is bolted down so won't fall out. And to me its situated closer to the batteries so it won't lose current when charging.
What I'm wanting to do is simply run whatever we need to use when plugged into 30 amp directly into panel number 1 and do away with the ATS 2. Everything I read says that the switching takes place in the main power panel where the shore power cord comes in and the second ATS is only used with an inverter. It's also possible wires were run into the ATS as the breaker slots are full. Get rid of the inverter, as its not hooked up anyway and add a new power panel in the outside bay. The new ones are smaller and I imagine more efficient. It would have the main power cord coming in, and outgoing would be panel 1, panel 2, generator, and electric, just delete the inverter.
Does anyone know if the second ATS has to be there, we can't see a reason for it other then to use with an inverter, and does this seem like a logical setup. Everything is working basically but I think it needs cleaned up. Even though they are dead I don't like seeing the loose and disconnected wires around and it will make it confusing for future maintenance.
Any ideas?
I can buy a Xantrex inverter with an ATS and a converter/charger built in. it's a pure sine wave inverter and the thing is $1900!! I told hubby the problem I see if one component fails you have lost a very expensive unit. We are pretty much thinking of just leaving the inverter out as it is now. Anyone see a problem with this?