taoshum
Well-known member
NY_Dutch said:CW just bought two more dealerships, I wouldn't write them off just yet.
LOL, they do seem to have deep pockets full of $$$
NY_Dutch said:CW just bought two more dealerships, I wouldn't write them off just yet.
Ned said:Tell them that they must include new tires in the deal, or discount the price enough to cover a new set of tires.
Gary RV Roamer said:The tire industry does not subscribe to the 7-year max tire age notion, so it's not surprising that CW and many other dealers don't feel they need to change out tires for that reason. Nor is the FHTSA going to come down on anybody for selling a vehicle with 7 year old tires unless there are more obvious signs of deterioration. I don't think CW is violating any law or even any ethical principle by selling a vehicle with aged tires.
The 7 year age "limit" is a rule of thumb for a prudent and trouble free RVing experience. Seeing a 7 year age on a tire is like seeing high mileage on an engine and transmission. It's a warning sign of future problems that are more likely to be near term than far, but it's mostly an economic matter. I'm not suggesting that anybody accept an RV with old tires - I wouldn't either. But to me it's a matter of negotiation for price vs value received.
Because they have 18 wheels and a blowout on one of them won't be an issue. On a motorhome a blowout can cause thousands of dollars worth of damage to the fiberglass and to the many systems an RV has that a truck does not have.chronic said:How else can they recap a tire carcass over and over and over again? And put hundreds of thousands of miles on them. Huge trucks that travel the most rocky roads at high speeds under terribly hot conditions?
How else can they recap a tire carcass over and over and over again? And put hundreds of thousands of miles on them.
Good old tires is an oxymoron. Tires wear out from the inside out also and it is not really practical to inspect the inside of your tires.chronic said:My other point is that in a way you "are" playing russian roullete every time you go out and buy a new set of tires instead of driving on your perfectly good, old, tested tires!
bucks2 said:There is a lot of wisdom in that post Gary. What is repeated often and quoted as "fact" sometimes needs to be brought back to reality. I recall a post on one of the forums 6 months ago or so that had changed the "7 year rule" to a 5 year recommendation. It took 20 or 30 posts to convince some folks that the tire manufacturers sites did not recommend replacement at 5 years as stated in one of the posts. We're all free to change tires at our own comfort level. If 5 years makes some more comfortable, then they should use that guide. If visual inspection with a good healthy dose of experience and common sense makes you happy, then that's a good guide too.
Just for a reference point, I change the tires on some of my cars on age rather than mileage too. My 1957 BMW's tires get changed when cracks start to show. It's low mileage (has 23,xxx since new, yes 55 years) and gets only low speed around town usage. The wife's 1999 Toyota started developing cracks in the tires at 6 years. They got replaced. Now at 7 years later there are no cracks and they will stay a while longer. Again a low mileage car, 21,xxx since new. So, it's not just RVs that change on a time schedule but other vehicles too.
Ken
Gary RV Roamer said:The tire industry does not subscribe to the 7-year max tire age notion, so it's not surprising that CW and many other dealers don't feel they need to change out tires for that reason. Nor is the FHTSA going to come down on anybody for selling a vehicle with 7 year old tires unless there are more obvious signs of deterioration. I don't think CW is violating any law or even any ethical principle by selling a vehicle with aged tires.
The 7 year age "limit" is a rule of thumb for a prudent and trouble free RVing experience. Seeing a 7 year age on a tire is like seeing high mileage on an engine and transmission. It's a warning sign of future problems that are more likely to be near term than far, but it's mostly an economic matter. I'm not suggesting that anybody accept an RV with old tires - I wouldn't either. But to me it's a matter of negotiation for price vs value received.
Fifty4F100 said:Does anyone know just what the tire industry DOES subscribe to?