Smoky said:
I am attracted to Tom Tom because someone said they offer free updates. I am trying to get Bruce to elaborate on his ?You get what you pay for? comment. Did he mean that he has discovered the Tom Tom does not have good mapping? I think that is all I need to verify before making a decision.
Thanks for the more in-depth evaluation of your Garmin. Yes, it is my new toy and compared to prior mapping ways, it is a tremendous help to me. And I may tire in time. OTOH, I doubt that I will -- perhaps because for 45 years, I have been a programmer in some capacity or another. As such, I understand the chore of keeping a product updated to the satisfaction of users of SW -- and am probably much more understanding of other SW developers and their approach to that chore.
I have the latest version (V8) for the 2610 (or for other models as well). That appears to include not only new streets and POIs, but updates to the SW that manipulates that data. I did not want a 2620 w/a hard drive. All of the maps will easily fit on a $10-$20 CF card now so an electro mechanical hard drive device does not make sense anymore compared to solid state storage. I have also downloaded the free update to the firmware inside the 2610. V8 was released in April. That means that they have had to get that ready by then which included alpha and beta tests of all that new SW, FW, and Data prior to the release. So that probably makes my data and SW about a year old. And that makes yours probably several years at least. If someone still has V6, you can imagine how far back that goes and the relevancy of the data and SW. (BTW, some define data as part of the SW, whereas I treat them separately).
The cost to a vendor to update their SW and Data has to be amortized via the sale of new units. In addition to adding new streets data, the SW has to become more and more intuitive and therefore, more complex. Step on, step two SW is easy to write -- whereas, knowing how every driver of an RV going cross country thinks about routing decisions is much tougher.
I charge for updates to my SW periodically, and would not be able to stay in business otherwise. If TomTom is giving free updates, that means they are either not very good, or they have a tremendous sales volume to offset that cost. I imagine it's the later coupled with a lower profit margin than Garmin has been able to enjoy, so far.
Now that so many others are successfully getting into the act, Garmin will continue to lower their price on updates -- that's the way the market works. One can buy the iPod that I paid $299 for $50 less now. I also feel that if someone has V6 (probably at least 4 years behind the curve), they need to pony up $75 for an update and/or not complain about getting lost in a subdivision that was built 2 years ago -- or spend $5-$900. for another GPS and only get lost in subdivisons built less than a year or so ago.
Anyway, as mentioned, I plan to use my 2610 for the next year or so, continue to test it's usefulness -- and then decide what to do next. They may continue updating the data -- especially if they feel that will generate more income that trying to get me to buy a new unit. I will not buy a "new" unit, ever. The factory refurbished one I have cost about a third of the original price -- and in a couple of years, am sure the newer units will have come down that much as well. Of course, all the junk (to me) I don't need is now being added - so hopefully, vanilla models will continue to available. Why would I want to spend money on a TomTom storage unit designed to be an MP3 player that I would never use -- for example?
This technology is incredibly awesome to me, Smoky. As I watch the addresses of the street I'm on, the name of the street coming up next or the exact wording on the next freeway exit sign, plus my speed and elevation -- and watch that little arrow move down the highway in my exact location, I am sure I can live with the reality that it will "always" be a bit behind and occasionally try to route me to Utah.
Life to me is a matter of well thought out trade-offs.
Anyway, am looking forward to comparing notes and flaws in like units a QZ. Jeff has suggested this and I think it is a great idea . . .