I owned a '94, 29' Winnie Brave Class A -- and now have a 96, 34' Adventurer.
Was also involved with a Rental Agency in Sacramento for several years -- and all their Class C rentals were Winnie's. In their experience, Winnie's held up better under the rigors of renters better than other vendor models. They "did" have Winnebago beef up the suspension springs on all the units they purchased as the stock springs did not hold up as well.
The bad news is that early '90's Winnie's had a floor problem. Seems the floor panels did not join at the chassis joints. So those joints between the chassis joints would start to sag over time. My '94 had that problem. Fortunately, the dealer working with Winnebago fixed mine even tho it was out of warranty. The fix cost about $2,500 (at the time). It involved cutting out the top layer plus the insulation of the existing floor and replacing it with plywood of similar thickness -- then putting the carpets back down. The plywood extended to each chassis joint as the original flooring should have. It "did" add weight to the rig, but I sure had solid floors after that.
So if looking at a used Winny in that vintage - be sure to check out the flooring. It will be especially noticeable just in front of the bedroom area and again around the dinette areas. Of course, the floor plans will be different so best check out the entire length of the rig aisle. I recall last year looking at a '95 Adventurer and noticed the floor "giving in" in front of the kitchen and also the entrance to the bedroom. The dealers response was, "Oh, nothing to worry about -- those are just Winny floors". ???
Aside from the flooring thing that seems to be OK in my '96, I am very high on Winnebago's or Itasca MH's.