Ray D
Well-known member
This thread serves no purpose. Just reminiscing on the day. :
I spent the last couple of days finalizing my purchasing decision for accessories, towing my toad. Talked to a lot of folks at several RV and one Workhorse Chassis service locations. A bit of a learning/confusing experience. ???
Talked to 4 sales and 8 service personnel, in those locations. Was doing some final price/brand comparisons and some fairly aggressive tentative bargaining. I think that was clear to the opposition. Looks like the same dealer as usual is going to win this one. (I didn?t go there. He was the one to beat, and they didn?t get the job done. The chassis service tech recommended them! They sell the systems, but sub the installation out to the RV dealer that is leading in my book, at this time.)
Came up with some fascinating claims/opinions/wisdom/rubbish. Can?t tell one from the other! (Note: the following notwithstanding, there will be some tow-bar and a braking system on board.)
Vehicles involved, one Damon Challenger, 2005, Workhorse Chassis. One Suzuki XL-7, 2003, toad.
Challenger towing capacity, 5,700. Hitch maximum, 5,000 lbs. Suzuki actual weight, loaded for towing, full gas tank, all gear, (no driver or passengers) - 3,740 lbs. (Weighed in late December.)
Challenger:
GVWR - 20,700. Actual weight, loaded for travel, water, gas, propane tanks, full - grey and black tanks empty, all gear and personnel, doggel, food, clothing, toys and emergency survival rations on board, 19,260 lbs. (Weighed just before winterizing, last fall.) (We actually travel with the water tank half full.)
GCWR - 26,000. Total of coach and toad as weighed, 23,000. Got a ton and a half to spare. (Hitch and brake systems will add some to that.)
Fascinating opinions and rubbish, (not differentiated,) here. :
All sold a variety of systems. Roadmaster was most recommended, and by far, for both towing and braking system. Blue Ox came in second. (First at one dealer.) Three other brands suggested, with few votes. Chassis service tech was very strongly in favor of Roadmaster. Wouldn?t consider any other!
All, with no exceptions, said the only reason I need an auxiliary braking system was for legal purposes. ?The coach brakes, alone, will stop both vehicles with no trouble.? Two recommended ?no box? systems for ease of use. Others recommended the box to save money. One recommended no brake system for the toad. ?No point in it. You don't need it! Spend your money on something else! No cop is ever going to stop you to see if you have a braking system!?
All of those who favored Roadmaster, favored the ?non-binding? feature on several tow bar models. ?You probably won?t ever need it, but if you do you will sure be glad you have it.? One, ?If you are in a situation where you have to drop the car, to get out of a jam, and your bar is bound, you?ll be really glad you have it!?
No Brakes Necessary Group: The chassis tech explained that the braking system on the Challenger is ?over engineered? for my unit. As I understand it, I am in the lower middle of chassis sizes that use this specific system. Many heavier commercial units use the same system, parts interchangeable, to over 30,000 lbs GCWR. To listen to him, the system is pretty common in Workhorse chassis units, without modification for heavier vehicles, and still quite reliable.
Re towing, I asked him what the ?weak link? was, in my case. Engine? Tranny? Hitch? Brakes? He said, ?towing ?that little Suzuki? there isn?t one. You?re not going to know it?s there!? Well, the proof is in the pudding, and in a few weeks we will ?summerize? and hit the road. Let?s see if I know it?s there.
Ray D. ;D
I spent the last couple of days finalizing my purchasing decision for accessories, towing my toad. Talked to a lot of folks at several RV and one Workhorse Chassis service locations. A bit of a learning/confusing experience. ???
Talked to 4 sales and 8 service personnel, in those locations. Was doing some final price/brand comparisons and some fairly aggressive tentative bargaining. I think that was clear to the opposition. Looks like the same dealer as usual is going to win this one. (I didn?t go there. He was the one to beat, and they didn?t get the job done. The chassis service tech recommended them! They sell the systems, but sub the installation out to the RV dealer that is leading in my book, at this time.)
Came up with some fascinating claims/opinions/wisdom/rubbish. Can?t tell one from the other! (Note: the following notwithstanding, there will be some tow-bar and a braking system on board.)
Vehicles involved, one Damon Challenger, 2005, Workhorse Chassis. One Suzuki XL-7, 2003, toad.
Challenger towing capacity, 5,700. Hitch maximum, 5,000 lbs. Suzuki actual weight, loaded for towing, full gas tank, all gear, (no driver or passengers) - 3,740 lbs. (Weighed in late December.)
Challenger:
GVWR - 20,700. Actual weight, loaded for travel, water, gas, propane tanks, full - grey and black tanks empty, all gear and personnel, doggel, food, clothing, toys and emergency survival rations on board, 19,260 lbs. (Weighed just before winterizing, last fall.) (We actually travel with the water tank half full.)
GCWR - 26,000. Total of coach and toad as weighed, 23,000. Got a ton and a half to spare. (Hitch and brake systems will add some to that.)
Fascinating opinions and rubbish, (not differentiated,) here. :
All sold a variety of systems. Roadmaster was most recommended, and by far, for both towing and braking system. Blue Ox came in second. (First at one dealer.) Three other brands suggested, with few votes. Chassis service tech was very strongly in favor of Roadmaster. Wouldn?t consider any other!
All, with no exceptions, said the only reason I need an auxiliary braking system was for legal purposes. ?The coach brakes, alone, will stop both vehicles with no trouble.? Two recommended ?no box? systems for ease of use. Others recommended the box to save money. One recommended no brake system for the toad. ?No point in it. You don't need it! Spend your money on something else! No cop is ever going to stop you to see if you have a braking system!?
All of those who favored Roadmaster, favored the ?non-binding? feature on several tow bar models. ?You probably won?t ever need it, but if you do you will sure be glad you have it.? One, ?If you are in a situation where you have to drop the car, to get out of a jam, and your bar is bound, you?ll be really glad you have it!?
No Brakes Necessary Group: The chassis tech explained that the braking system on the Challenger is ?over engineered? for my unit. As I understand it, I am in the lower middle of chassis sizes that use this specific system. Many heavier commercial units use the same system, parts interchangeable, to over 30,000 lbs GCWR. To listen to him, the system is pretty common in Workhorse chassis units, without modification for heavier vehicles, and still quite reliable.
Re towing, I asked him what the ?weak link? was, in my case. Engine? Tranny? Hitch? Brakes? He said, ?towing ?that little Suzuki? there isn?t one. You?re not going to know it?s there!? Well, the proof is in the pudding, and in a few weeks we will ?summerize? and hit the road. Let?s see if I know it?s there.
Ray D. ;D