BernieD1
Senior Member
As a follow up to ongoing discussions regarding MT registration and where pressure is coming from, Bob Clerc posted the following on the Diesel RV Yahoo Group. With his permission:
Mentioned a few weeks back that there was a dealer group in the mid-west
taking MT to court over LLC. Apparently their claim is that the MT LLCs
are causing RVers to not buy from their mid-west dealer network because
some states in that area, notably IN, are talking about imposing a sales
tax on any unit sold in that state, no matter where subsequently
registered--like MT. The "new" thing I learned about this is that
Affinity Group, Inc (AGI) is an affiliate of this dealer group. I don't
know the nature of that affiliation, but it would certainly seem that
AGI would thus support the interests of that dealer group. The reason
that the role of AGI in this becomes relevant to RVers is that AGI is
the parent of Trailer Life publications and of the Good Sam Club. It is
my belief and believe that it can clearly be shown, that AGI, through
its operating components, TL and GS, nearly always comes down on the
side of the RV industry rather than the best interests of RVers.
I ranted a couple weeks ago about how Sue Bray, executive director of
the Good Sam Club, has come out several times in support of the federal
fee demonstration program. It may be that she has a honest conviction
that the fee demonstration program is best for all in view of the
realities of federal budgeting. However, I have a suspicion that the
best interests of the campground owner/operator group (ARVC) is what
really motivates her. The more impediments, i.e., fees, are placed
before the RVer in using federal lands, the more likely we are to use
the ARVC campgrounds. This was clearly demonstrated a few years ago when
the Good Sam club (and possibly TL publications) came out with strong
statements that it was unsafe/unwise to stay at other than "approved
campgrounds". This, to me, was clearly a pitch by ARVC, through the AGI
operating components, to stay away from Wal Mart and similar, which was
denying revenue to their members. There was nothing balanced in their
position. It was, in my mind, clearly a commercial pitch by AGI without
any regard for the real facts in the matter, namely, that once in a
while, due to driver fatigue or other factors, it might really be best
to take refuge at a Wal Mart or similar.
Although I don't have much use for the Good Sam club or its publication,
although a life member, I believe the TL publications to have very good
technical content and many worthwhile articles about various aspects of
RVs and RVing. It just seems a shame that we have no publication of
fairly widespread distribution that is focused from cover to cover on
the best interest of the RVer and, in fact, one that takes an advocacy
role in some critical issues particularly as pertains to safety. For
example, most of the problems with tires--primarily blowouts--are the
result of RVer neglect in one way or another, and the tire industry
generally puts out very good tires (if the proper ones are selected by
the RV manufacturer). However, from time to time, there are problem
tires. We have no mechanism to really alert RVers and to challenge the
tire manufacturer that they really have a problem with this or that
specific tire series. We really have the fox guarding the chicken coop.
Wish there were an alternative.
Mentioned a few weeks back that there was a dealer group in the mid-west
taking MT to court over LLC. Apparently their claim is that the MT LLCs
are causing RVers to not buy from their mid-west dealer network because
some states in that area, notably IN, are talking about imposing a sales
tax on any unit sold in that state, no matter where subsequently
registered--like MT. The "new" thing I learned about this is that
Affinity Group, Inc (AGI) is an affiliate of this dealer group. I don't
know the nature of that affiliation, but it would certainly seem that
AGI would thus support the interests of that dealer group. The reason
that the role of AGI in this becomes relevant to RVers is that AGI is
the parent of Trailer Life publications and of the Good Sam Club. It is
my belief and believe that it can clearly be shown, that AGI, through
its operating components, TL and GS, nearly always comes down on the
side of the RV industry rather than the best interests of RVers.
I ranted a couple weeks ago about how Sue Bray, executive director of
the Good Sam Club, has come out several times in support of the federal
fee demonstration program. It may be that she has a honest conviction
that the fee demonstration program is best for all in view of the
realities of federal budgeting. However, I have a suspicion that the
best interests of the campground owner/operator group (ARVC) is what
really motivates her. The more impediments, i.e., fees, are placed
before the RVer in using federal lands, the more likely we are to use
the ARVC campgrounds. This was clearly demonstrated a few years ago when
the Good Sam club (and possibly TL publications) came out with strong
statements that it was unsafe/unwise to stay at other than "approved
campgrounds". This, to me, was clearly a pitch by ARVC, through the AGI
operating components, to stay away from Wal Mart and similar, which was
denying revenue to their members. There was nothing balanced in their
position. It was, in my mind, clearly a commercial pitch by AGI without
any regard for the real facts in the matter, namely, that once in a
while, due to driver fatigue or other factors, it might really be best
to take refuge at a Wal Mart or similar.
Although I don't have much use for the Good Sam club or its publication,
although a life member, I believe the TL publications to have very good
technical content and many worthwhile articles about various aspects of
RVs and RVing. It just seems a shame that we have no publication of
fairly widespread distribution that is focused from cover to cover on
the best interest of the RVer and, in fact, one that takes an advocacy
role in some critical issues particularly as pertains to safety. For
example, most of the problems with tires--primarily blowouts--are the
result of RVer neglect in one way or another, and the tire industry
generally puts out very good tires (if the proper ones are selected by
the RV manufacturer). However, from time to time, there are problem
tires. We have no mechanism to really alert RVers and to challenge the
tire manufacturer that they really have a problem with this or that
specific tire series. We really have the fox guarding the chicken coop.
Wish there were an alternative.