A member questioned whether recent anti-EV articles during high gas prices might be backed by oil companies, using an article about drivers walking away from EVs as an example. Several members felt the article was more likely media clickbait or seasonal filler than an oil industry campaign, while others said the concerns it raised reflect real EV limitations for some owners, especially around charging access, rural travel, battery cost, depreciation, and expectations set during the buying...
More...
A member questioned whether recent anti-EV articles during high gas prices might be backed by oil companies, using an article about drivers walking away from EVs as an example. Several members felt the article was more likely media clickbait or seasonal filler than an oil industry campaign, while others said the concerns it raised reflect real EV limitations for some owners, especially around charging access, rural travel, battery cost, depreciation, and expectations set during the buying process.
Members compared EV adoption to RV ownership, noting both can be a good fit for some people and a poor fit for others. The discussion expanded into used EV demand, home charging costs, free charging availability, campground and RV park chargers, Tesla charging perks, grid capacity, California solar power, and the reliability of EV sales and infrastructure claims. Bottom line: the topic did not reach agreement on EV practicality or market strength, but several members agreed the original article was likely written to attract attention rather than prove a clear trend.