I agree also Tom, and never said otherwise.
Sue/Al, I have no need to make any excuses, and nothing I have explained is an excuse. Very few WM's are posted "No Overnight", though I agree in some areas there are a higher than normal concentration, because of the geographical reach of municipal administrations.
There are multiple sides to this story, as you might expect.
1. WM is trying to use their evening open back lots to serve their RV customers.
2. Many long haul RVers do not want the hassle of checking into a campground when they are not going to stick around to enjoy the amenities. They just need a safe and convenient spot to park and then move on to their ultimate destination. Saving money may be one objective, but my experience is that it is eclipsed by the convenience and security objectives.
3. Some RVers abuse this and try to "camp" at WMS in order to save money.
4. Many campgrounds have their own ulterior motives and see this activity as revenue they could move to their own pockets.
5. Some communities see overnight parking as an eyesore. The alliance between such communities, the CG operators, and the government admins is sometimes an unholy one, and on other occasions a responsible one.
6. There is far too much emotion about this issue on all sides, and not nearly enough mutual understanding.
Tom, it is this last item I was complimenting you about earlier. I did not mean to say you had started "camping" at WM. But that recently you have increased your tolerance for appreciating both sides of this recurring debate.
Sue/Al, I should add, for your understanding of where I am coming from, that I spend upwards of $5,000 annually on campgrounds. Maybe I do not need to explain that to you, but I detected a tone of criticism in your comments and though I might throw that fact in. I still enjoy my WM transit stops though and appreciate WM for their attentiveness to RVers.