Members debate the wisdom of purchasing new electric vehicles (EVs), with the main argument centering on rapid depreciation—highlighted by stories of high-end Teslas selling used for less than a new economy car. Several RVers note that EVs now depreciate even faster than RVs themselves, making used EVs a more attractive option for buyers who want to avoid significant value loss. Some members share personal experiences with homebuilt or converted EVs, emphasizing that while technology is...
More...
Members debate the wisdom of purchasing new electric vehicles (EVs), with the main argument centering on rapid depreciation—highlighted by stories of high-end Teslas selling used for less than a new economy car. Several RVers note that EVs now depreciate even faster than RVs themselves, making used EVs a more attractive option for buyers who want to avoid significant value loss. Some members share personal experiences with homebuilt or converted EVs, emphasizing that while technology is advancing, the best deals are currently in the used market.
The discussion shifts to the environmental impact and lifecycle of EV batteries. Members disagree on the true rate of battery recycling, with some citing sources that claim only 5% of EV batteries are recycled in the US, while others argue that many batteries are being repurposed for secondary uses like solar storage. The debate also touches on the semantics of "recycling" versus "repurposing," and whether EVs genuinely offer a net environmental benefit compared to internal combustion engine vehicles.
Overall, the consensus is that buying a new EV may not make financial sense due to steep depreciation and ongoing uncertainties about battery longevity and recycling. However, members acknowledge that all vehicles have environmental trade-offs, and the best approach is to weigh personal needs, costs, and the evolving technology before making a decision.