DonTom
Senior Member
RV LIFE Pro
Perhaps only being on a motorcycle would help, as in my case.Even air bags were of no help.
-Don- Auburn, CA
Perhaps only being on a motorcycle would help, as in my case.Even air bags were of no help.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but at one time wasn't lane splitting in CA only allowed if the traffic was moving at less than ~15 MPH?Yes, it often is. One of the main reasons I prefer to take a motorcycle between here and my Reno house. If the traffic is stopped for construction or whatever on I-80 here in CA, which is very common, it can take a car two hours longer than on a motorcycle because of the legal lane splitting which cars cannot do.
-Don- Auburn, CA
LOL, been there & done that countless times. On my way to work in my youth, I'd ride on a (paved) mountain road that followed the twists and turns of the mountain. So, I'd bank this way and that and back again countless times. Every winter I'd hit black ice, the bike would slide from under me, heading down the road, and I'd be sliding on my butt behind it. One time, a bus coming the other way stopped and the driver leaned out the window and asked "you OK?". I nodded and he drove off.I have been riding motorcycle of one sort or another all of my life. If they were not so much fun, I would never get on one.
There are two types of bikers, those that have been down on the ground and those that are going to be down on the ground.
AFAIK, that was a recommendation, not a law. But I follow that recommendation, so it makes no difference to me if it is law or not.Correct me if I'm wrong, but at one time wasn't lane splitting in CA only allowed if the traffic was moving at less than ~15 MPH?
Oddly enough, if it were claimed cats have two anuses there would follow 17 links to pseudo-authoritative feline research arguing for the house cat double assh*** theory, but the CA law with regards to lane splitting is shrouded in mystery.AFAIK, that was a recommendation, not a law. But I follow that recommendation, so it makes no difference to me if it is law or not.
-Don- Auburn, CA
You are no doubt referring to the feline sphincter splitting law.Oddly enough, if it were claimed cats have two anuses there would follow 17 links to pseudo-authoritative feline research arguing for the house cat double assh*** theory, but the CA law with regards to lane splitting is shrouded in mystery.
I think that was Schrodinger's theory.You are no doubt referring to the feline sphincter splitting law.
I don’t see the correlation between quantum superposition and feline dual sphincterism.I think that was Schrodinger's theory.
I have been down more times than I can count. Weird reasons, such as the time I was riding into the sun and could not see much. On the road ahead was around a gallon or two of oil which was spilled on the road that I could not see with the sun in my eyes. I was riding slow, and the bike was straight up a second before I was on the ground.There are two types of bikers, those that have been down on the ground and those that are going to be down on the ground.
This is what the Vehicle Code has to say:Correct me if I'm wrong, but at one time wasn't lane splitting in CA only allowed if the traffic was moving at less than ~15 MPH?
My last time down was on a dirt bike hill climbing. I was a little fast on speed. At the top of the hill, the trail turned a hard 120-degree back to the right. I got a little too hard on the front brake and down I went. Almost immediately my foot went numb. After I caught my breath. I ask my son to start my bike, put me on, it and rode 4 miles on rough trails back to camp. I spent weeks on crutches. The wife suggested that at 57 maybe I should start trying to act my age. That crazy thought inspired me to buy a HD Ultra limited for the road. Sometimes when your married you need to find a good working compromise. lol. 10 years later, I still miss trail riding.LOL, been there & done that countless times. On my way to work in my youth, I'd ride on a (paved) mountain road that followed the twists and turns of the mountain. So, I'd bank this way and that and back again countless times. Every winter I'd hit black ice, the bike would slide from under me, heading down the road, and I'd be sliding on my butt behind it. One time, a bus coming the other way stopped and the driver leaned out the window and asked "you OK?". I nodded and he drove off.
How about the fact that there are less motorcycle accidents where lane splitting is legal than illegal? A lot less motorcycles are rear- ended where lane splitting is legal. Safter where there is an unexpected sudden stop of cars ahead.Makes no sense to me why it should be.
Not true. Meantime in the DFW cars change lanes suddenly and without notice with the entire herd moving at 80 mph. Pity the motorcycle splitting lanes here, "roadkill" would be an apt descriptor.How about the fact that there are less motorcycle accidents where lane splitting is legal than illegal? A lot less motorcycles are rear- ended where lane splitting is legal. Safter where there is an unexpected sudden stop of cars ahead.
That is why now several other states are considering making some form of lane splitting legal.
Just because it seems dangerous to some is not evidence of danger.
-Don- Auburn, CA
Be sure to explain the to those who have well studied it, such as here.Not true.
Which says:
Ok, I had not considered potential safety implications where bikes would be allowed to sit between lanes. But when I see a bike zooming between lanes driving through miles of stopped traffic, as I have on a number of occasions, that has little to do with safety that I can see. Wait it out like all the other drivers.Just because it seems dangerous to some is not evidence of danger.
-Don- Auburn, CA