Yeah, also what I was thinking, but there was probably no pain at all, the way things are done these days.Ouch. They had to use a drill
If they are that dangerous, why not kill them. The entire species should be exterminated.A Mojave Rattlesnake. The best way to tell it apart from the Western Diamondback is by the extra width of the white bands just above the rattle as shown in your video at 2:30 where it shows the white bands double the width of the black bands. With the WDB, the white and black bands are very close to the same width.
These two snakes are among the most dangerous in the USA and are difficult to tell apart. And it is important to know if getting bit because of the antivenom--very different. The Mojave venom is closer to the way cobra bite works--on the nervous system. The WDB works on the respiratory system.
Nevertheless, here in this RV Park they catch them alive and relocate them farther out in the desert, they do not kill them, and neither would I.
-Don- Sonaran Desert RV Park, Gila Bend, AZ
While copperhead bites are the most common venomous snake bites in the USA, they cause almost no deaths. IIRC, the total number of deaths is five people out of the many thousands of copperhead bites.My ex-mother in law was bitten by a Copperhead in her back yard when she was about 67 years old, and ended up spending nearly 5 weeks in the VA hospital recovering afterwards.
We could say that for the human species. The most destructive animal that has ever lived on earth.If they are that dangerous, why not kill them. The entire species should be exterminated.
I would posit most folks suffering snake bites cannot identify the snake.These two snakes are among the most dangerous in the USA and are difficult to tell apart. And it is important to know if getting bit because of the antivenom
Then why kill anything; ants, roaches, spiders, mosquitoes, ticks.We could say that for the human species.
Just snakes being snakes.If they are that dangerous, why not kill them. The entire species should be exterminated.
The original comment was about exterminating the species.Then why kill anything; ants, roaches, spiders, mosquitoes, ticks.
I believe there's plenty of evidence that shows removing a snake from its territory is as good as killing it.. . . here in this RV Park they catch them alive and relocate them farther out in the desert, they do not kill them, and neither would I.
Right before we killed the rattlesnake on our porch we tried to ascertain with the snake if we were invading its territory. But he just kept rattling.With only very rare exceptions, snakes are not dangerous if we don't try to invade their territory.
I would like to see that evidence. First I have heard that. Removing it from its environment will kill it, but not a simple relocation to a similar environment. In fact, there are many snakes that have lived longer in captivity than normally live in the wild. They may not be able to find their old den or whatever, but that is not normally much of an issue.I believe there's plenty of evidence that shows removing a snake from its territory is as good as killing it.
Yes, but how much theri insurance paid the hospital is not known by the public:. After their insurance company negotiated with the hospital, the family paid only $7,200.
I know little about the antivenom. I have wondered if they mix them for the areas where the Western Diamond Back and Mojave rattlesnake share the same areas. And many places they do overlap in range such as right here in Gila Bend.I would posit most folks suffering snake bites cannot identify the snake.
Yes, I have heard the same. But I also do not know how it works or how the hospital is paid. I doubt if the hospital does much of anything for free. They have a lot of large bills and high salaries to pay.Hospitals are required to give emergency treatment if a patient has no insurance, per rules for Medicare and Medicaid but i don't know all the details other than they cannot refuse a seriously injured or sick patient.