Derby6
Senior Member
I am in the NOT necessary camp. Never have used one to date. Like many we drink bottled water -- Cooking we used both bottled and from the tap.I know filters are necessary,
Please help me sort out real life fact from hype.
I have considered adding a filter and if I ever do it would likely be the simple blue inline one like the one Kirk pictured in post #20.
Arsenic cannot be removed with simple filtration. It requires complex reverse osmosis or other systems. Really doesn't fit in a water filter thread.Water in many locations has a high amount of arsenic in it, which causes problems to remove and makes water more expensive.
This is Alaska Problem too. But let's be clear. 10 Parts Per Million (PPM) or 10 micrograms per liter (mcg/L) is the limit now. The US average is around 5 PPM. The standard was 50 PPM until EPA got it reduced to 10 PPM in 2001 taking effect in 2006. Any system serving over 25 households needs to be tested. So unless a private well specifically is tested they don't know arsenic levels.some areas have levels that exceed the safe drinking water standard of 10 micrograms per liter (mcg/L).
I lived in a house that averaged 28 PPM and raised 2 kids. I have since moved and the subdivision is still out of compliance to date. Everyone is just fine other than tens/Hundreds of thousands of peoples money have gone to try and fix the issue--Its better, but still above 10 PPM. This is just another example of over-regulation.