kjansen said:
I hope 100% of the new fee goes to the park service.
Actually, the two bills as written, provide no revenue directly to the NPS. Both provide that UP TO 10M annually will be placed in an endowment to be managed by the National Park Foundation. First problem -- no requirement that any money actually be allocated. Second problem, IMHO, is that it funds a private Washington-insider so-called foundation where you can expect that at least 10-20%+ of the money will be used by them for "administrative" costs which, on a good note I guess, includes lobbying. But, the foundation's interest and political health will always be #1 on their agenda. Each bill then specifies a second annual amount to be placed in another private fund for NPS projects but these monies can only be released when matching private funds are raised on a project by project basis. Hmmm . . How many devils are in those details? The only real winners are the lobbyists (which pushed for this source of funding) and the private contractors who'll be awarded the work. Okay, I guess roads without potholes benefit us all IF funding is directed by the NPF for such non-sexy purposes. This whole privatization thing of the NPS, forest service, really irks me and if there really is a 12B $ shortfall (another GAO report), then something is not working.
I'm a proponent of user fees. But I gotta ask--if you're raising the discount prices for senoirs, why are entire military families, 4th graders, disabled folks, and volunteers still gonna get FREE access? I'm not arguing that any one group is more or less deserving than another so
please don't go there. But in terms of equity, it seems the pain could have been spread a little more evenly.
At the projected revenue stream, 250,000 new senior passes would need purchasing every year at the new rate. Is this even reasonable?
END of rant.
On a positive note, I also would like to thank John for his original post. I did a 3 hour RT road trip yesterday to a COE dam office and purchased a pass. Yah, I spent some additional on gas, but I got peace of mind on several levels.
Linda