There are two common themes that I don't get. And it bothers me because I have genuinely enjoyed the give and take in these forums.
Apparently, 1) the mfg quality control across the spectrum is pretty bad and relies on after service fixes. 2) a lot of new buyers do a PDI, then, I guess because they want to get on the road, sign off and take their unit on the assumption that the dealer will remedy these issues within a reasonable time.
These units cost a lot of money, heh, probably more money then most rvers ever spent on a car, yet why not just stop accepting these units? Don't sign off until the items on the list are fixed? Defer your desires to get on the road. Keep your money and your leverage until the unit is acceptable. Or simple say keep the unit and go buy another? I know this is asking a lot of you as buyers, but...moaning about the new rv quality control issues is not doing it.
How else are you, as customers, going to force the industry to take notice?
Isn't it time for a quality control performance revolution?
Apparently, 1) the mfg quality control across the spectrum is pretty bad and relies on after service fixes. 2) a lot of new buyers do a PDI, then, I guess because they want to get on the road, sign off and take their unit on the assumption that the dealer will remedy these issues within a reasonable time.
These units cost a lot of money, heh, probably more money then most rvers ever spent on a car, yet why not just stop accepting these units? Don't sign off until the items on the list are fixed? Defer your desires to get on the road. Keep your money and your leverage until the unit is acceptable. Or simple say keep the unit and go buy another? I know this is asking a lot of you as buyers, but...moaning about the new rv quality control issues is not doing it.
How else are you, as customers, going to force the industry to take notice?
Isn't it time for a quality control performance revolution?