JerArdra
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2005
- Posts
- 1,814
11/1/2006
All,
Panasonic FZ-50
I?ve been looking? at the new Panasonic FZ-50. So far I have read every review I could find plus I just found a new forum on Yahoo Groups specifically for the FZ-30 and FZ-50 cameras combined. It?s called Panasonic_FZ.
Noise is a tiny bit less than the FZ-30 but nothing to write home about. The ISO speeds now go up through 800, 1600, and even 3200 which until today I thought would be useless. On the new Yahoo forum one person was at a graduation ceremony with low lighting and he had to use full telephoto (no flash) which is a very bad situation for noise. He posted his comments and photos as follows:
Take a look at these images. I had been to the convocation ceremony
of a friend graduating out of B-School. As I sat in the audience far
away from the stage in this dark auditorium, I couldn't walk up close
to the stage to take snaps. So I shot from where I sat, often at FULL
zoom. Many heads came in the way (as is visible).
And the fully rotating LCD of the FZ50 helped get above
them... Something that would never have been possible with a dSLR!
So here are the pics: Hand held in low light. I struggled with Auto
ISO in Program mode until I finally switched to High Sensitivity mode!
The pics are of Don Betz, Chancellor, University of Wisconsin River
Falls. Take a look (sorry you?ll have to cut and paste these into
your browser)
First Try:
First Attempt: http://i10.tinypic.com/4bogrvr.jpg ISO 200 Handshake
Second Attempt: http://i10.tinypic.com/2qi2puo.jpg ISO 200 Subject Move
Third Attempt: http://i9.tinypic.com/2hi80ah.jpg ISO 400
Final Attempt: http://i10.tinypic.com/4cwpzzp.jpg ISO 3200 "High Sensitive"
Second Try:
First Attempt: http://i10.tinypic.com/3zqhqty.jpg ISO 200
Second Attempt: http://i10.tinypic.com/2yltz79.jpg ISO 200 again
Final Attempt: http://i10.tinypic.com/30m7m0k.jpg ISO 3200 "High Sensitive"
In this case ISO 3200 is MUCH better then NO usable photo at all. Noise can be reduced with software but no software can fix blur.
BTW, ISO 3200 is a special case in the FZ-50, the lowest ISO is 100 and the highest (normal) is 1600. 1600 is the highest ISO you can set (allowing full control on the camera). The ISO 3200 comes only in the special Scene Mode called "High Sensitive". This is reachable by switching the camera to the Scene mode on the dial so it's VERY quick to cahnge to.
There is also this new feature in the FZ50 called the Intelligent ISO (I-ISO). When using this, the camera detects subject movement and bumps up the ISO a notch. So, while the stabilization compensates for hand-shake, the I-ISO increases ISO thus allowing faster shutter speed?thus reducing blur. This might be good option to use for full telephoto pics on a bright sunny day where noise is not a great problem but you do NOT want blur. You could even use it indoors in low light where a flash cannot be used but you probably would have to post process some of the noise out if you print for anything larger than 4 by 6 prints.
It?s a 10 Mpix camera but I only use 5 Mpix so at 5 Mpix the telephoto is now 598 mm while my FZ-30 is 535 mm tele so its tele is a tiny bit more.
Anyhow I?m still looking. No decision yet. To you folks with an FZ-30 I say keep it for now. The added features of the FZ-50 are not revolutionary. The FZ-30 is still a GREAT camera.
JerryF
All,
Panasonic FZ-50
I?ve been looking? at the new Panasonic FZ-50. So far I have read every review I could find plus I just found a new forum on Yahoo Groups specifically for the FZ-30 and FZ-50 cameras combined. It?s called Panasonic_FZ.
Noise is a tiny bit less than the FZ-30 but nothing to write home about. The ISO speeds now go up through 800, 1600, and even 3200 which until today I thought would be useless. On the new Yahoo forum one person was at a graduation ceremony with low lighting and he had to use full telephoto (no flash) which is a very bad situation for noise. He posted his comments and photos as follows:
Take a look at these images. I had been to the convocation ceremony
of a friend graduating out of B-School. As I sat in the audience far
away from the stage in this dark auditorium, I couldn't walk up close
to the stage to take snaps. So I shot from where I sat, often at FULL
zoom. Many heads came in the way (as is visible).
And the fully rotating LCD of the FZ50 helped get above
them... Something that would never have been possible with a dSLR!
So here are the pics: Hand held in low light. I struggled with Auto
ISO in Program mode until I finally switched to High Sensitivity mode!
The pics are of Don Betz, Chancellor, University of Wisconsin River
Falls. Take a look (sorry you?ll have to cut and paste these into
your browser)
First Try:
First Attempt: http://i10.tinypic.com/4bogrvr.jpg ISO 200 Handshake
Second Attempt: http://i10.tinypic.com/2qi2puo.jpg ISO 200 Subject Move
Third Attempt: http://i9.tinypic.com/2hi80ah.jpg ISO 400
Final Attempt: http://i10.tinypic.com/4cwpzzp.jpg ISO 3200 "High Sensitive"
Second Try:
First Attempt: http://i10.tinypic.com/3zqhqty.jpg ISO 200
Second Attempt: http://i10.tinypic.com/2yltz79.jpg ISO 200 again
Final Attempt: http://i10.tinypic.com/30m7m0k.jpg ISO 3200 "High Sensitive"
In this case ISO 3200 is MUCH better then NO usable photo at all. Noise can be reduced with software but no software can fix blur.
BTW, ISO 3200 is a special case in the FZ-50, the lowest ISO is 100 and the highest (normal) is 1600. 1600 is the highest ISO you can set (allowing full control on the camera). The ISO 3200 comes only in the special Scene Mode called "High Sensitive". This is reachable by switching the camera to the Scene mode on the dial so it's VERY quick to cahnge to.
There is also this new feature in the FZ50 called the Intelligent ISO (I-ISO). When using this, the camera detects subject movement and bumps up the ISO a notch. So, while the stabilization compensates for hand-shake, the I-ISO increases ISO thus allowing faster shutter speed?thus reducing blur. This might be good option to use for full telephoto pics on a bright sunny day where noise is not a great problem but you do NOT want blur. You could even use it indoors in low light where a flash cannot be used but you probably would have to post process some of the noise out if you print for anything larger than 4 by 6 prints.
It?s a 10 Mpix camera but I only use 5 Mpix so at 5 Mpix the telephoto is now 598 mm while my FZ-30 is 535 mm tele so its tele is a tiny bit more.
Anyhow I?m still looking. No decision yet. To you folks with an FZ-30 I say keep it for now. The added features of the FZ-50 are not revolutionary. The FZ-30 is still a GREAT camera.
JerryF