Wrong. I support every gun law that goes after the criminals without disarming the good guys.
I see this in you.That's the most disappointing part. I don't think I learned anything new.But such is usually the case when talking with people with such extreme viewpoints. There's no reasoning, and a lot of flat out lies.
Did you not learn anything new or did you learn things you did not want to learn?That's the most disappointing part. I don't think I learned anything new.
I suggest "Following the manufacturer's recommendations."
I am all for people that are going to carry firearms to be properly trained but the last time I checked the 2A does not apply only to people that are good shots. I am pretty sure there are over half the states that have adopted constitutional carry and quite a few in recent years and have we had a lot more firearm accidents because of it?
The problem with this is the way many of these sorts of laws are implemented, at one end they are put in place as a annoyance to concealed carry holders, ie required to take an 8 hour class every year or two then show you can hit the broadside of a barn when shooting in a low stress environment. The other end of the spectrum is putting the requirements so stringent that military special forces personnel that fire thousands of practice rounds per year have a hard time passing. Neither of which does much good to meet their purported goals.
That's the way they do it here in NV. A full day class (mine was ten hours). The last half of that at the firing range.
And I believe this is a good thing. I, as a Qualified Retired Law Enforcement Officer - QRLEO by LEOSA standards - have to qual annually with a local law enforcement agency. I have always believed that if I have to do it annually everyone who wishes to carry should have to do it at least every few years. And I developed muscle memory that I will never lose after almost 30 years of range time multiple times a year.
It is unconstitutional. As much as I believe that people should be trained on safe gun handling and have range training requiring it can open up a can of worms similar to other gun laws.
Most manufacturers of passenger vehicle include manuals that will have some recommendations for the type of oil to be used in said vehicles.
I personally use toad to describe a car towed by a MH but the point was to open up an "oil thread" jokingly.
Other than the constitutional question, I personally don't mind the idea of reasonable proficiency requirements, google says the LEOSA standards are 17 of 24 shots in the 7 right (outer largest ring) of a standard B27 silhouette target, google does not say the range, here the CCW permit requires I think 70% hit at 25 feet into the sihouette of a B27 or did when I took the class a number of years ago. I just looked at the current requirements (Louisiana passed a constitutional carry bill that goes into effect July 4th so somewhat moot), it looks like they have added more hoops since I did the class circa 15 years ago, some new hoops, fingerprints, but must be done by state police (when I did my class they accepted fingerprints done at local police or sheriffs offices) are anyone that is divorced must submit divorce paperwork, court orders, etc. which I find insane for a CCW, I am divorced, why should it matter that was a quarter of a century ago, or well be in a couple of months.
