This thread has certainly been eye opening to the way I think vs. how others may think or perceive things. Each person it entitled to their own thoughts on this or any other issue however and wether we choose to respond to this post or any post in a serious manner or a jesting manner is equally each person's perogative. At the same time, we have to be responsable to ourselves as to wether or not we offend somebody else with what we believe is our own twisted humor. Having said that, I am offender and guilty of offending others with what I may have perceived as being funny (well it was to me and maybe a few others.....while it wasn't funny to another group). For that, I apologize to anybody that I may have offended for anything that I may have thought funny at the time.
I'm capabable of offending, even intimidating when I think the situation warrants it....however, as I get older those would be very rare moments. Can't think of a case where I'd intentionally hurt somebody's feelings on the net....after all, it's the internet and everything has to be taken with a grain of salt.....stay in neutral until you have the facts.....easy does it kind of attitude and try not to be so quick to judge or interpret what a poster "really meant".
When I first read the header, I thought "why would somebody ridicule another for being a vegan (biker, catholic, blue coller worker.....insert your own here). I read the first post and admired the poster for being straight forward and representing who/what he really is. Not for me, but more power to him was my thought.
As I read down the posts, I read what I perceived as the same thoughts, not for them but more power to the original poster and one or two of the posts (the pheasant) done with a bit of twisted humor (actually my kind of humor and I even chuckled) however, coming from a neutral position I certainly didn't read in to it that he was ridiculing the original poster....but just an off handed way of saying "it's not for me but more power to you" and doing that with respect for the original poster for standing up to him.
Having said that, I also know (from the sexual harrassment training for managers that I have to take every year) that it's not up to the person delivering the messege to determine if it's offending but actually up to the person receiveing the message to determine if it was harrassment. So.........where does it all land?
I think the original poster knew and expected (by the title alone) not everybody to agree with his life choice and may even be surprised by the support that he's got in support of his post (even if we don't agree with that choice for ourselves). Does he feel ridiculed? That's up for him to decide. But I try to keep in mind that we all have a choice wether or not we want to be a victim in cases like this. I choose not to be.....somebody else may just disagree with me and their entitled to that.
You know, this kind of thing could go on and on. hes4all posted that he doesn't kill anything unless he's going to consume it. I know others that would not agree with that approach or attitude, that you shouldn't kill anything unless you're going to use all the parts of the animal (fur, bones, etc.) like they do in Alaska.
Again, I'm sorry if I've offended anybody......not my intention. Isn't it great to live in America!