BIG JOE said:
Just an opinion # 1, based on my own personal experiences from 60 years of Construction Equipment operation . . . (after 5, F-350, DRW's ?
)
Thanks for taking the time to clarify. Just need to point-out, I have "run the numbers" and the F350 --
for a comparable vehicle i.e. engine, cab, bed length, axle ratio, SRW etc, and the data demonstrates that what I said above is true. That was the whole point of taking the time to post the numbers. For towing, braking, frame, and features, the F250 and F350 are the exact same in the 2017 model. You get 1000# more payload -- and that is due to springs, which BTW you can upgrade the F250 springs to those like the F350 via the Camper Pkg. But truck payload has nothing to do with the original issue which was using
length=28 feet only to justify needing a 350 vs. a 250.
I'm not bashing the 350 either, and I won't change your opinion I know. But to some extent, it's based on vehicles from the long gone past and would maybe apply for older, used vehicles a person might consider, but certainly does not for 2017 models. Which again, is the point, whereas I know it takes more time and effort, when people are posting about tow capability and 1/2 ton to 1 ton trucks, one just HAS to specify what YEAR they are talking about if they really want to help folks understand why they should consider one truck vs. another. Or, specify one is talking about a DRW, rather than SWR -- cause the 350 still comes as SRW if wanted. BTW -
I'm talking Fords only, I have no idea how new Chevy or Rams compare in the size vs. capability debate
I still hope that one day soon, you'll get curious Joe and stop into a Ford dealer that has a 2017 F250 XLT or Lariat you can look at and maybe drive. You might change your own opinion, or maybe budge just a little.
Maybe just watch a YouTube video or two to pique your interest. Thanks for your thoughts. Linda