A Traveler
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2014
- Posts
- 660
Weather reporting and information available today is not as good as it was back in the 80s.
I am a retired corporate pilot. I flew mostly Beechcraft King Airs, and retired in a King Air 350 In 2019. I started flying in 1983. Back in the 80s we had hundreds of Flight Service Stations (FSS) around the country where we got our weather briefings. The online era of obtaining weather information had not yet arrived. The accuracy of the weather forecasts we obtained from FSS in the 80s was better than what is available online today.
The problem now is that the weather information online is all automatically gathered by various computers around the country. There is no local or personal experience input in the forecasts now. But that local, personal experience was tremendously valuable to us! Often I would talk with a FSS briefer who would tell me that the local weather was pretty bad, but then go on to say something like, “I’ve seen this weather pattern here before. By your arrival time things will be much better.” I cannot recall a time when that kind of local weather info steered me wrong.
Today there is no local experience in the automated online weather, and that skews the forecasts tremendously. A good example of how wrong the forecasts can be now is a flight I had back in April, 2017. The online weather forecast for our destination airport was calling for low clouds at only 400 feet off the ground, and 1-mile visibility in fog, rain and mist. The destination airport had an Instrument Landing System (ILS), so we could legally and safely land in that low weather, but my co-pilot and I would sure be sitting up straight and paying attention on final approach! When we got there, the actual weather we encountered was a 7,000 foot cloud ceiling and unlimited visibility under the clouds. That’s a long way from 400 and 1.
I find watching the so-called “weather reports” on TV today to be some fine comedy. They are all based on the computer models, which are often very, very wrong.
I am a retired corporate pilot. I flew mostly Beechcraft King Airs, and retired in a King Air 350 In 2019. I started flying in 1983. Back in the 80s we had hundreds of Flight Service Stations (FSS) around the country where we got our weather briefings. The online era of obtaining weather information had not yet arrived. The accuracy of the weather forecasts we obtained from FSS in the 80s was better than what is available online today.
The problem now is that the weather information online is all automatically gathered by various computers around the country. There is no local or personal experience input in the forecasts now. But that local, personal experience was tremendously valuable to us! Often I would talk with a FSS briefer who would tell me that the local weather was pretty bad, but then go on to say something like, “I’ve seen this weather pattern here before. By your arrival time things will be much better.” I cannot recall a time when that kind of local weather info steered me wrong.
Today there is no local experience in the automated online weather, and that skews the forecasts tremendously. A good example of how wrong the forecasts can be now is a flight I had back in April, 2017. The online weather forecast for our destination airport was calling for low clouds at only 400 feet off the ground, and 1-mile visibility in fog, rain and mist. The destination airport had an Instrument Landing System (ILS), so we could legally and safely land in that low weather, but my co-pilot and I would sure be sitting up straight and paying attention on final approach! When we got there, the actual weather we encountered was a 7,000 foot cloud ceiling and unlimited visibility under the clouds. That’s a long way from 400 and 1.
I find watching the so-called “weather reports” on TV today to be some fine comedy. They are all based on the computer models, which are often very, very wrong.
Last edited: