Back2PA
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2015
- Posts
- 5,766
Bill N said:I am pretty sure I am a ) ) . Otherwise it's too late to change so maybe we can meet there............lol
LOL, could be standing next to you either way Bill
Bill N said:I am pretty sure I am a ) ) . Otherwise it's too late to change so maybe we can meet there............lol
I am hoping you will have to wait a LLLLLLOOOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNGGGGGGGGGG time for my arrivalBill N said:I am pretty sure I am a ) ). Otherwise it's too late to change so maybe we can meet there............lol
SuzanneH said:The root cause of this was NOT money...it was because there was a "successful" movement to stop the practice of keeping these patients safe and cared for in order to respect their "rights". As this happened, THAT was when homelessness really started becoming the problem it is today. . . .
Maybe we need to take another look at the State Hospital system. Surely there must be some middle ground that would respect individual freedoms and rights but still offer a haven to those who, by no fault of their own, must deal with mental illness and all the fallout from their illness.
I think the point was that relatives of P.T. Barnum are among us.Paul 1950 said:And the point is?
Dreamsend said:The reason state hospitals closed was absolutely due to lack of money!!! It happened in early 1981 when the Reagan admin (no politics attached) cut off all federal funding to the States that was ear-marked for the types of care being discussed. If anyone was paying attention back then, as I was, this sudden lack of money resulted in thousands of people being turned out on the streets and is was a mini crisis of sorts. It was reported for months, and not on the internet. The federal govt gives all kind of money to states for various programs--not just health care or job training etc. When the homeless--mentally ill dollars dried up overnight, each state was left to its devices to find the funds. Most could not, because all states depend heavily on federal $$$ to remain solvent. All states have recovered somewhat over the ensuing 30 years, some better than others at providing care, but none have made it a priority to provide care like pre-1981 levels.
There are "state" institutions for mentally and physically challenged people, we just don't call then "state hospitals" anymore --maybe due to the abuses of 60+ years ago. Most come under Medicaid funding, which again is fed dollars spent as each state sees fit (within guidelines of course). The problem remains however that there is not enough capacity to take care of all those that need it, so people come and go, when it would be safer and morally better for them to not go. Many who would have been hospitalized in days gone by now live at home cared for by family because there is no place for them to go. And many of these families desperately need help, while facing 3-5 year or more waiting lists to get into a state facility.
So depending on where you live, the problem may be more or less visible depending on how well the state you're in provides for the care of those that need it. But it did all mushroom, and become a major issue that is still with us today because of lack of money. Not my opinion, just history.
Linda
Arch Hoagland said:Sure wish there was an obvious simple answer.
garyb1st said:Are you suggesting this is not true?
sightseers said:support ? what's that worth today.... you can just buy a dossier that will support anything you want.
The reality is all mental hospitals and prisons (actually just a mental hospital for the non docile ones ) are houses of horror. They are the things most people never want to see or realize are happening....it's worse than watching those shivering chained up puppy commercials.
Oldgator73 said:If profit was taken out of the equation mental institutions, prisons and now child detention camps would be much less populated. For the uber rich there are really nice facilities to send those that are harmful to either themselves or others. For the rest of us there are only federal, state or for profit institutions and prisons. As for the for profit institutions, I would posit a lot of folks are sent to these facilities and kept there purely for the reason to pad somebodies bank account.
FenderP said:Yeah, because the majority of people in prison are not there for committing a crime. They were framed so the institutions can get more money. :
Oldgator73 said:The federal prison population alone is 184,000. Of that nearly 20,000 are in private prisons. The US has the largest prison population of any developed country in the world. So to answer your question, I would say yes, there are many folks in prison that do not belong there.
FenderP said:Foil hat time.
Paul 1950 said:Do you wear yours shiny side in, or shiny side out?
Lou Schneider said:The shiny side has superior reflective properties, so you want to wear it on the outside to repel all of those nasty EMF forces away from your head.
Wearing the foil shiny side in not only allows more of the EMF forces to get through to your brain, but once they're in it will just keep reflecting back any that manage to escape.
Duh.